LACK OF SPIRITUAL VISION
Again, we would state that with the most keen-sighted saints
there still lingers such a measure of inability to see that at times
it becomes very noticeable. That is, while they see some things
clearly, other things they fail to see.
There is a dimness of vision which comes from the presence of the
carnal mind. Carnality is blinding. Our first parents put on leaf
aprons and thought they were covered, they skulked among the trees
of the garden and flattered themselves that they were hidden. Ever
since that day men have been carnally blind to the real facts of the
glaring visibility of their sins, as well as blind to their own
heart conditions and the condition of the world around them. Besides
all this they do not know God and are blind to the fact that they
are led captive by the devil at his will.
Carnality is the owlet atheism that closes its blue-fringed eyelids
tight, and, flying athwart the glorious sun in heaven, hoots, "Where
is it?"
Carnality is a horse with blinders which can see nothing but its own
path, self-sufficient, filled with its own ways.
Carnality is a bat that delights in the darkness, and covers with
its demon wings every good thing.
Carnality is a mole that burrows amid the clay of earth, feeds on
its filth and hates the light of day.
Nothing good can be said of carnality. It is evil, only evil and
always evil! When this hateful thing is under consideration, we cry,
"Death, and only death for him,
Without pity, limb from limb,
Hew him with the Spirit's mighty, flaming sword."
But in our zeal to escape carnality we should not rush men into
an impossible task of endeavoring to become omniscient. Only God
sees all. Perhaps angels see enough that they never mistake, but men
are so blind naturally that they never will, in this life, get
beyond mistakes in spiritual vision. There are various reasons for
this lack of vision -- perhaps we should not say blindness.
The world does not believe in the Spirit, from the fact that it does
not see Him. Christians have a spiritual vision of Jesus.
Men are materialists. In proportion as they learn to look beyond the
material and are governed by the spiritual, in that proportion they
become spiritually minded. Since men live in material bodies, speak
with material tongues, hear with material ears, feel with material
hands and see with material eyes, it stands to reason that they to
some extent judge, weigh, and draw conclusions from the material
point of view. But this view may be wrong, and while the soul may
discover this error it is entirely possible that it may not.
A worshiper shouts the praises of God. One person says, "That shout
is surely of God"; another says, "I can not see any God in it." Both
of these persons who expressed their opinions were good men, but one
was surely mistaken, and this mistake was doubtless caused by a lack
of spiritual insight.
An evangelist preaches. One says that that preacher is not of God,
another man declares he was overwhelmed with a sense of the divine
presence. Some one has mistaken the preacher. Either the first man
has misjudged because he did not feel any special blessing on his
own soul or did not discern his ideal of power, or it may be the
second man is mistaken in ascribing to the preacher a blessing which
originated in his own soul. The first man may have judged by the
sight of his eyes. One thing is sure, infallibility of spiritual
sight is not a necessary accompaniment of holiness of heart.
Then this lack of spiritual vision may be caused by errors in
education. It is a noted fact that some very spiritual people have
held some very erroneous doctrines. We need only to cite the reader
to the Catholicism of Madam Guyon and Fenelon, the mystical
tendencies of George Fox, which caused him to reject all ordinances,
or the asceticism of Origen, Tertullian and hundreds of others.
One of the most spiritual of New Testament commentators is Pasquier
Quesnel, a Jansenist Catholic. In spite of the occasional Roman
Catholic errors of his doctrine he was so spiritual that he drew
down upon himself the anathemas of the pope, and that impostor
condemned the writings of Quesnel in a bull in which were cited one
hundred and one so-called errors. Quesnel died in exile. Concerning
this seeming contradiction, in the introduction to Quesnel's
"Reflections on the Gospels," Daniel Wilson says:
And when we see the eminent, the almost unparalleled
attainments in the spiritual life, of such men as Pascal, Nicole,
Quesnel -- when we see their love to God, their separation from
the vanities of the world, their holy communion of prayer, their
sense of the unutterable evil of sin -- their apprehension of the
divine grace, as the source of all good -- their simple, fervent,
self-denying love of Christ -- their compassion and zeal for the
souls of their fellow-creatures; we must acknowledge that
intellectual errors are less valid to overthrow than moral and
affectionate emotions of the soul are powerful to sustain the
spiritual life. The Christian lives by love, not by doctrine. If
there be light enough in the understanding to lead to an
acquaintance with ourselves and with Jesus Christ, our attainments
will go on in proportion to our holy affections, our fervent
prayers, our measure of the Holy Spirit, our self-abasement and
our union with Christ, the Head of all influence and grace.
Again, a lack of spiritual vision may be caused by a lack of
reasoning powers. It is not necessary that men possess gigantic
reasoning powers to be wholly sanctified. They must know enough to
recognize God and their own spiritual duties, but beyond this they
may know very little. Most people live by impulse, not by reason.
Deficient reasoning powers may be assisted or quickened by the
incoming of holiness, and while they may, yet they doubtless will
not be made strong. The man who lived by impulse before his
conversion will generally do the same afterward; that is his mental
make-up and he can not change it. We all know that a conclusion
formed by impulse is not as reliable as one formed by good, normal
reasoning, and a conclusion concerning spiritual matters formed by
impulse is not as dependable as one which will bear the scrutiny of
intelligent investigation.
To be sure there is such a thing as divine impulse, or being moved
by the Holy Ghost, and we would be the last to disparage it, but God
has warned us not to believe every spirit, and has told us to put
each to the test. Here we note that there is such a thing as a lack
of the power of spiritual discernment which will allow some on the
spur of the moment, or because of strong appeal, to form wrong
conclusions of duty. Infallible understanding of one's whole duty is
not an absolute essential to holiness of heart, neither does strong
spiritual vision prove that the heart is clean.
Finally, lack of spiritual vision may be caused by a lack in the
faculty which discerns the fitness of things. Neither is this
faculty infallible. It is barely possible that some who have been so
fortunate as to sit on the stationing committee have realized their
own lack of a sense of fitness in stationing the preachers, or if
they have failed to see it themselves, others have seen it for them.
Stationing committees are not infallible. It is possible that a
preacher, a holy man, will reprove when he should comfort, or
comfort when he should reprove; he might preach holiness when
justification is needed, or talk when he should be praying.
Preachers are not infallible. A layman might stay at home when he
should go to meeting, or withhold when he should give, or possibly
he might give when he should withhold. Laymen are not infallible.
With all of us there lingers a surprising lack of fitness. If
the reader should think himself exempt, this very fact proves his
lack of self-discernment. The old heathen said, "Know thyself," but
while the Christian approaches the ideal, yet even he has not
thoroughly mastered his subject
This blindness is often manifested in a lack of ability to see one's
own faults and a persistency in seeing the faults of others. We will
never forget the picture in an old reader: A tall, stoop-shouldered
man is walking along the path, behind him is a little hunchback
pointing at the tall man's stoop shoulders and grinning. We often
think of this picture when we see holiness (?) professors perfectly
unconscious of their own faults and always ready to see the faults
of others. "Why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's
eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"
Our eyes are not set in our heads for introspection but for
extraspection. Until God opens our eyes we see others and not
ourselves. Possibly with all of us there still remain some things
about ourselves to learn.
|