| STATEMENT AND DEFINITIONS.The saintly Fletcher says:  
              It is excessively wrong to conclude that all these burdens, 
              infirmities, appetites, passions, and aversions are those sinful 
              workings of our corrupt nature, which are sometimes called the 
              'flesh.' You cannot continue a whole day in deep prostration of 
              body and soul, nor perhaps one hour upon your knees; your stomach 
              involuntarily rises at the sight of some food which some persons 
              esteem delicious; your strength fails in outward works; your 
              spirits are exhausted; you faint or sleep, when others are active 
              and toil; you need the spiritual and bodily cordials which others 
              can administer; perhaps also you are afflicted with disagreeable 
              sensations in the outward man, through the natural necessary play 
              of the various springs which belong to flesh and blood; your just 
              grief vents itself in tears; your zeal for God is attended with a 
              proper anger at sin; nay, misapplying what the apostle says of the 
              carnal man under the law, you may declare with great truth, The 
              [extensive] good I would, I do not; and the [accidental] evil I 
              would not, that I do; I would convert every sinner, relieve every 
              distressed object, and daily visit every sick bed in the kingdom; 
              but cannot do it. I would never try the patience of my friends, 
              never stir up the envy of my rivals, never excite the malice of my 
              enemies; but I cannot help doing this undesigned evil as often as 
              I strongly exert myself in the discharge of my duty. The reasons why so many fail to comprehend the experience of 
            entire sanctification are as numerous and varied as are the 
            dispositions of the numberless persons who are concerned; and, as a 
            consequence, it is impossible that any line of instruction should 
            fit all, and concrete examples must be advanced in order that 
            definite instructions may be given, but, in the absence of such 
            examples, we must either be content to confine ourselves to some 
            general rules which are capable of specific application, or suppose 
            examples which will illustrate certain classes of individuals. What 
            we have to say will be a blending of these two methods.  Many persons make the mistake of observing their own experience, 
            and sometimes the observation is very superficial indeed, and thus 
            reach certain conclusions which they form into universal rules and 
            proceed to apply to one and all without respect to character, 
            surroundings, make up, degree of light, or physical or mental 
            conditions. By such a course souls are utterly confused; and are 
            unable to reach satisfactory conclusions as to their duty and 
            standing.
 Remember, my brother, that the only test of holiness is deliverance 
            from sin, and not certain peculiar manifestations which you observe 
            in your own experience. These manifestations have to do with your 
            own peculiar temperament and not with your heart conditions.
 
 This brings out the thought that if the experience of holiness were 
            stripped of the human element it would be the simplest thing in the 
            world, but, owing to the presence of this complex element, the 
            manifestations, both inward and outward, for which we can look when 
            one professes the experience, become so exceedingly complex, that at 
            times we almost despair of clearing up the fog with which, even by 
            well-meaning people, the doctrine is surrounded.
 
 Let us draw the distinction between the two works of grace: Many 
            theologians teach that justification and sanctification are the same 
            in kind, and that they differ only in degree, that is, holiness is 
            only a bigger blessing. To us this seems to be a fundamental 
            mistake, tending only to foster error and to befog the real point at 
            issue -- deliverance from the carnal mind.
 
 When a person is justified (and we here use the word "justified" in 
            its broad sense, including all the accompaniments of initial 
            salvation,) first, all his sins are forgiven, and all his moral 
            relations with both God and men, and the universe are changed. God 
            reveals, by the witness of the Spirit, the fact of forgiveness, 
            translates the recipient into the kingdom of Christ, and adopts him 
            into the family. He also fills this newly saved one with joy as a 
            result of his deliverance from sin and condemnation, and gives a 
            deep and blessed consciousness of divine favor. But in addition to 
            all this, God introduces into his moral faculties a new vigor, by 
            which he is enabled to hold under control the sinful tendencies 
            which still characterize the essence of the soul, and to defeat the 
            temptations of the devil. New "lamps are hung through his intellect" 
            by which he is enabled to discern the presence of moral evil, and 
            the will of God. God puts new quickness, tenderness and control into 
            the renewed conscience, new intensities into all the good 
            sensibilities, and new energy into the will.
 
 The additional work which is accomplished in sanctification is the 
            removal of inbred corruption and the intensification of the graces 
            already received; this intensification coming more from the removal 
            of remaining and hindering depravity than from the addition of new 
            measures of grace.
   |