| 
												
												ARGUMENT.
												
												NAHUM was a native of Elkoshai, 
												or Elkosh, a little village of 
												Galilee, the ruins of which 
												remained in the time of St. 
												Jerome. It appears, from Nahum 
												2:2, that he prophesied after 
												the captivity of the ten tribes, 
												which took place in the ninth 
												year of Hezekiah, and after the 
												war of Sennacherib in Egypt, 
												because he speaks of the taking 
												of No-ammon in that country as 
												of an event past, Nahum 3:8. But 
												it is probable that the first 
												chapter at least of this 
												prophecy was delivered before 
												the invasion of Judah by 
												Sennacherib, as in the latter 
												part of it, namely, from Micah 
												7:8-15, he seems to predict that 
												attempt, and the defeat thereof. 
												“And probably,” says Henry, “it 
												was delivered a little before 
												it, for the encouragement of 
												God’s people in that time of 
												treading down and perplexity.” 
												The other two chapters are 
												thought by some to have been 
												delivered some years after, 
												perhaps in the reign of 
												Manasseh; in which reign the 
												Jewish chronologers generally 
												place this prophet, somewhat 
												nearer the time when Nineveh was 
												conquered. He must have 
												prophesied, however, before the 
												captivity of the two tribes, as 
												he supposes them to be still in 
												their own country, and there 
												celebrating their festivals as 
												usual.
 The subject of this prophecy is, 
												the destruction of Nineveh, and 
												the overthrow of the Assyrian 
												empire, which Nahum describes in 
												a manner so pathetic and 
												picturesque, and yet so plain, 
												as is not to be exceeded by the 
												greatest masters of oratory. And 
												all his predictions were exactly 
												verified in the siege and taking 
												of that city, by Nabopolassar 
												and Astyages, in the year of the 
												world 3378, about 100 years 
												after they were uttered. “The 
												conduct and imagery of this 
												prophetical poem,” says 
												Archbishop Newcome, “are truly 
												admirable. The exordium grandly 
												sets forth the justice and power 
												of God, tempered by lenity and 
												goodness, Nahum 1:2-8. A sudden 
												address to the Assyrians 
												follows; and a prediction of 
												their perplexity and overthrow, 
												as devisers of evil against the 
												true God, Micah 7:9-11. Jehovah 
												himself then proclaims freedom 
												to his people from the Assyrian 
												yoke, and the destruction of the 
												Assyrian idols; upon which the 
												prophet, in a most lively 
												manner, turns the attention of 
												Judah to the approach of the 
												messenger who brings such glad 
												tidings; and bids her celebrate 
												her festivals, and offer her 
												thank-offerings, without fear of 
												so powerful an adversary, Micah 
												7:12-15. In the next place, 
												Nineveh is called on to prepare 
												for the approach of her enemies, 
												as instruments in the hand of 
												Jehovah; and the military array 
												and muster of the Medes and 
												Babylonians, their rapid 
												approach to the city, the 
												process of the siege, the 
												capture of the place, the 
												captivity, lamentation, and 
												flight of the inhabitants, the 
												sacking of the wealthy city, and 
												the consequent desolation and 
												terror, are described in the 
												true spirit of eastern poetry, 
												and with many pathetic, vivid, 
												and sublime images, Nahum 
												2:1-10. A grand and animated 
												allegory succeeds this 
												description, and is explained 
												and applied to the city of 
												Nineveh, Micah 7:11-13. The 
												prophet then denounces a wo 
												against Nineveh for her perfidy 
												and violence; and strongly 
												places before our eyes the 
												number of her chariots and 
												cavalry, her burnished arms, and 
												the great and unrelenting 
												slaughter which she spread 
												around her, assigning her 
												idolatries as one cause of her 
												ignominious and unpitied fall, 
												Nahum 3:1-7.” To overthrow her 
												false confidence in her forces 
												and alliances, he reminds her of 
												the destruction of No-ammon, her 
												rival in populousness, 
												confederacies, and situation, 
												which had shared a fate like 
												that which awaited her; 
												beautifully illustrating the 
												ease with which her strong holds 
												should be taken, and her 
												pusillanimity during the siege, 
												Micah 7:8-13. “He pronounces 
												that all her preparations, her 
												numbers, her opulence, her 
												multitude of chief men, would be 
												of no avail, and that her 
												tributaries would all desert 
												her, Micah 7:14-18. He concludes 
												with a proper epiphonema; the 
												topics of which are, the 
												greatness and incurableness of 
												her wound, and the just triumph 
												of others over her, on account 
												of her extensive oppressions, 
												Micah 7:19.” To sum up all with 
												the decisive judgment of an 
												eminent critic: “None of the 
												minor prophets seem to equal 
												Nahum, in boldness, ardour, and 
												sublimity. His prophecy too 
												forms a regular and perfect 
												poem; the exordium is not merely 
												magnificent, it is truly 
												majestic; the preparation for 
												the destruction of Nineveh, and 
												the description of its downfall 
												and desolation, are expressed in 
												the most glowing colours, and 
												are bold and luminous in the 
												highest degree.” Præl. Hebr. 21. 
												p. 282.
 |