By John Walter Beardslee
I. Name The Hebrew title of this book is Mishle Shelomoh, "Proverbs of Solomon." It belongs to what is called the Hhokhma or wisdom literature, because it is largely given to philosophical speculation on the great questions which agitated the Jewish mind. The word Mashal, "proverb," means properly, "A representation, i.e., a statement not resting solely on a single fact, but standing for or representing other similar facts." "The Mashal is by usage limited almost entirely to observations relative to human life and character, and is expressed commonly in a short, pointed form." (Driver, Int. 6th Ed., p. 394.) This literature embodies the practical ethics of the times. Cheyne calls these writers the humanists and realists of their times. (Job and Solomon, p. 119.) They were not opposed to the prophets but moved in a different sphere, the practical affairs of daily life. They embodied the result of their study in short pithy sayings which the people could easily grasp, putting them in similitudes, riddles, dark sayings and parables. The Book of Proverbs is the best specimen of this literature. II. Analysis The Book is divided into seven parts with an introductory statement at the head of each part except three and seven.
III. Age and Authorship From this general outline of the contents it is plain that the book is of compo-site origin. Parts of it are ascribed to Solomon, other parts to other authors. Sections 1, 2 and 4 are directly assigned to Solomon, unless the title of Section 1 be regarded as a heading given to the entire collection by the final editor. The general opinion is that Section 2 is the personal work of Solomon and forms the basis around which the entire collection was gathered. This breathes the atmosphere of the best thought and the greatest prosperity of the nation. Delitzsch locates the formal collection of this section in the reign of Jehoshaphat, about a century after Solomon, but there is no good reason why we should not trace the authorship of the proverbs in it back directly to Solomon himself. His fitness for such work may be inferred from 1 Kings 4:32. To this original nucleus Hezekiah's men added Chs. 25 to 29, ascribing them to Solomon. The difference in thought and language between this section and Chs. 10 to 24 is thought by many to indicate a later origin. In Chs. 10-24 the work is very symmetrical, the parallelism very regular, the tone cheerful and the royal position honored without question. In Chs. 25 to 29 the formation is quite irregular, the proverbs are not confined to two members but extend to four, five, or even ten members, the evidences are numerous that the country is less prosperous and the king less honored. But all these conditions may be due to the unfortunate decay of Solomon's later life. It is not necessary to show that Solomon wrote every proverb of the section. He originated the form of expression, and others, with less artistic skill and literary finish, followed his models as closely as they were able. As for the other sections of the book, Chs. 1 to 9, which form a general introduction, almost certainly belong to Solomon, although there is room for the suggestion that the style, which differs somewhat from the portions which are traced to Solomon, indicates that it may have been revised by the one who finally completed the collection. Sections 3, 5, 6 and 7 furnish no clue to their authorship beyond what the text supplies. Much difference of opinion exists as to the time when the final collection was made. Kautzsch, The Literature of the Old Testament, p. 153, and Cheyne, Founders of Old Testament Criticism, p. 340, place it after the exile; Delitzsch, in the reign of Jehoshaphat, a century after Solomon; Ewald, in the beginning of the eighth century B. C. The earlier dates seem more likely to be correct. LITERATURE
|
|
|