| PREFACEPhilippi was a considerable 
												city on the eastern frontier of 
												Macedonia, now part of European 
												Turkey. It was anciently named 
												Datos; but Philip, the father of 
												Alexander the Great, having 
												repaired, enlarged, and 
												beautified it, called it 
												“Philippi,” after his own name. 
												It stood to the north-west of 
												Neapolis, about seventy miles 
												north-east of Thessalonica, and 
												about one hundred and ninety 
												west of the place where 
												Constantinople now stands. 
												Julius Cesar placed a colony 
												here, which Augustus afterward 
												enlarged, and hence the 
												inhabitants were considered as 
												freemen of Rome. It was rendered 
												remarkable for the famous battle 
												fought near it, between the 
												Roman Emperor Augustus and 
												Antony on one side, and Brutus 
												and Cassius, the republican 
												generals, on the other. But it 
												is more remarkable among 
												Christians for the Christian 
												church which was early planted 
												there, and for this excellent 
												epistle, written to the members 
												thereof about twelve years 
												after, namely, during the latter 
												part of the apostle’s 
												imprisonment at Rome, about the 
												year 64 or 65, and sent by 
												Epaphroditus.
 Of the first introduction of the 
												gospel into Macedonia, an 
												account has been given, Acts 
												16:9, &c. St. Paul, with his 
												assistants, Silas and Timothy, 
												after having preached the gospel 
												in most of the countries of the 
												Lesser Asia, were directed by 
												the Holy Ghost to pass over into 
												Europe, for the purpose of 
												offering salvation to the 
												Greeks, at that time the most 
												celebrated people in the world 
												for genius and learning. These 
												messengers of God, therefore, 
												loosing from Troas, landed at 
												Neapolis; but making no stay 
												there, they went directly 
												forward to Philippi, where, it 
												appears from Acts 16:18, they 
												abode a considerable time, and 
												were instrumental in converting 
												many to the faith of Christ.
 
 It appears they met with no 
												opposition in this place, till 
												the apostle cast a spirit of 
												divination out of a damsel. But 
												that circumstance so enraged her 
												masters, who made a considerable 
												advantage of her “soothsaying,” 
												that they stirred up the 
												inhabitants against Paul and 
												Silas, whom, after they had laid 
												many stripes on them, they threw 
												into prison, the jailer making 
												“their feet fast in the stocks.” 
												But the Lord, whose servants 
												they were, soon released them by 
												a signal miracle, as is recorded 
												Acts 16:25; and the magistrates, 
												finding that they were Romans, 
												came and took them out of 
												prison, and treated them 
												civilly; desiring them, however, 
												for the quiet of the city, to 
												depart out of it: which they 
												did, when they had seen and 
												conversed with the new converts, 
												and had comforted them. But 
												though Paul and Silas for the 
												present left Philippi, Luke and 
												Timothy continued there some 
												time longer, to carry on the 
												work which had been so 
												successfully begun. And this, it 
												is probable, was one reason that 
												induced the apostle to fix upon 
												the latter as the most proper 
												person to visit the Philippians 
												in his absence, of whose 
												affection for them, and concern 
												for their interests, he takes 
												particular notice, Philippians 
												2:19-22.
 
 That the apostle himself made 
												the Philippians a second visit, 
												appears from Acts 20:6; though 
												we are not informed of any 
												particulars relating to it. And 
												it is highly probable that he 
												visited them often, as he passed 
												to and from Greece. And, indeed, 
												the peculiar affection and 
												respect which they manifested to 
												the apostle, entitled them to 
												some distinguished regard: for 
												while he preached in 
												Thessalonica, they sent him 
												money twice. And this, it seems, 
												they did, both from the 
												gratitude which they felt to him 
												for being instrumental in 
												bringing them out of the 
												darkness of heathenism, and from 
												the concern they had that the 
												success of the gospel should not 
												be hindered among their 
												countrymen, by its preachers 
												becoming burdensome to them. The 
												same regard they showed to him, 
												and for the same reason, while 
												he preached the gospel in 
												Corinth, 2 Corinthians 11:9. He 
												also acknowledges (Philippians 
												4:18) to have received a present 
												from them by the hands of 
												Epaphroditus, when he was a 
												prisoner at Rome.
 
 These, however, were not the 
												only proofs which the 
												Philippians gave of their love 
												to the apostle, and the religion 
												which they had received. Their 
												behaviour in other respects was 
												every way worthy of their 
												profession. They maintained the 
												doctrine of the gospel in its 
												purity, and walked in the holy 
												manner required by its precepts. 
												Indeed, the excellent character 
												of these Christians may be 
												inferred from the manner in 
												which this epistle is written. 
												For, while most of his other 
												letters contain reprehensions of 
												some for their errors, and of 
												others for their bad conduct, 
												throughout the whole of this 
												epistle to the Philippians no 
												fault is found with any of them; 
												unless the caution, (Philippians 
												2:3-4,) to avoid strife and vain 
												glory in the exercise of their 
												spiritual gifts, can be called a 
												reprehension. But his letter is 
												employed almost wholly in 
												commending and encouraging them, 
												or in giving them exhortations 
												to persevere and make advances 
												in the good ways of the Lord. 
												But though the apostle did not 
												see it needful to censure or 
												reprove the Philippian believers 
												for any thing, he judged it 
												necessary to pass a severe 
												censure on some Judaizing 
												teachers, who were endeavouring 
												to introduce themselves among 
												them, as they had done among the 
												Christians in other places, 
												making it, as it seems, their 
												whole business to destroy the 
												purity and peace of the 
												churches. Of these corrupters of 
												the gospel the apostle, out of 
												his zeal for the truth, and his 
												great love to his Philippian 
												converts, speaks with more 
												severity than in any of his 
												other letters, being doubtless 
												directed so to do by a 
												particular impulse of the Spirit 
												of God, who knew it necessary 
												that this sharpness should be 
												used for opening the eyes of the 
												faithful, and making them 
												sensible of the malignity of 
												these false teachers, and of the 
												pernicious tendency of their 
												doctrine.
   |