| 
												
												Verse 1Numbers 19:1. The people had 
												complained of the strictness of 
												the law which forbade their near 
												approach to the tabernacle, 
												(Numbers 17:13,) and the sudden 
												death of so many by the late 
												plague had put such numbers of 
												their friends and relations into 
												a state of legal uncleanness, 
												which rendered them incapable of 
												approaching it, and filled them 
												with a fear of perishing in 
												their uncleanness; in answer, 
												therefore, to their complaints, 
												and to free them from this fear, 
												they are here shown how they 
												might be purified from the 
												greatest legal uncleanness, so 
												as to approach God in his 
												ordinances and among his people, 
												without either fear or danger.
 
 Verse 2
 Numbers 19:2. This is the law 
												which the Lord hath commanded — 
												Or rather, had commanded. For it 
												is probable that the water of 
												purification had been made 
												before, although the manner of 
												making it is here first 
												described. That they bring thee 
												a red heifer — Provided at the 
												expense of the congregation, 
												because they were all to have a 
												joint interest in it; as all 
												believers, the spiritual Israel, 
												have in Christ, typified by it. 
												Here a question arises, why this 
												sacrifice (if it may be so 
												called) must be a heifer, when 
												in other cases bullocks are 
												appointed, and, in general, the 
												male is preferred to the female. 
												According to St. Austin and 
												Theodoret, the weaker sex was to 
												signify that infirmity of the 
												flesh wherewith Christ was 
												clothed. But the reason which 
												Dr. Spencer assigns seems to be 
												more plausible, which is, that 
												it was in opposition to the 
												Egyptian superstition. For 
												though the Egyptians offered 
												bullocks in sacrifice, they had 
												cows in great veneration; as 
												Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, 
												Ælian, Porphyry, and others, 
												unanimously declare. Porphyry 
												says they would rather have 
												eaten human flesh than that of 
												cows. In order, therefore, to 
												expose this folly of Egypt in 
												the eyes of the Israelites, God 
												directs Moses to appoint one 
												solemn institution wherein a 
												heifer was to be the victim. A 
												red heifer — A fit colour to 
												shadow forth the nature of sin, 
												and the blood of Christ, from 
												which this water and all other 
												rites had their purifying 
												virtue. The Jews say, that it 
												was necessary the heifer should 
												be entirely red, without the 
												least mixture of any other 
												colour, and that if but two 
												hairs were black or white it was 
												unfit for this sacrifice. 
												Without spot — Hebrew, תמימה, 
												temima, perfect; wherein is no 
												blemish — Thus typifying the 
												spotless purity and sinless 
												perfection of the Lord Jesus. 
												Upon which never came yoke — 
												This was not necessary in other 
												sacrifices; but may here be 
												considered as signifying the 
												perfect freedom of the Lord 
												Jesus from every obligation to 
												undertake our cause and die in 
												our stead, save that which love 
												laid him under. For when he 
												said, Lo, I come, he was bound 
												by no other cords than those of 
												his great love to us.
 
 Verse 3
 Numbers 19:3. Ye shall give her 
												unto Eleazar — Who was the 
												second priest, and in some cases 
												the deputy of the high-priest. 
												To him this service was 
												committed, and not to Aaron, 
												because it was not fit that 
												Aaron should be engaged in any 
												thing that would render him 
												ceremonially unclean, although 
												but till the evening, Numbers 
												19:8. Yet as it was an affair of 
												great moment, especially as 
												typifying the sufferings and 
												death of Christ, and 
												purification through his blood, 
												it was proper it should be 
												performed by him who was next to 
												Aaron in dignity. The chief 
												priests of our Lord’s time had 
												the principal hand in his death. 
												That he may bring her forth 
												without the camp — Partly 
												because this heifer was reputed 
												an unclean and accursed thing, 
												being laden with the sins of all 
												the people, and partly to 
												signify that Christ should 
												suffer without the gate, 
												(Hebrews 13:12,) in the place 
												where malefactors suffered.
 
 Verse 4
 Numbers 19:4. Sprinkle of her 
												blood directly before the 
												tabernacle — This made it in 
												some sort an expiation of sin; 
												for the sprinkling of the blood 
												before the Lord was the chief 
												solemnity in all the sacrifices 
												of atonement: therefore, though 
												this was not done at the altar, 
												yet, being done toward the 
												sanctuary, it was intimated 
												hereby that the virtue and 
												validity of it depended upon the 
												sanctuary, and were derived from 
												it. Thus, in the satisfaction 
												that was made to God by the 
												death of Christ, our great High- 
												Priest, who, by the eternal 
												Spirit, (called, Luke 12:20, the 
												finger of God,) offered himself 
												without spot to God; he did, as 
												it were, sprinkle his own blood 
												directly before the sanctuary, 
												when he said, “Father, into thy 
												hands I commit my spirit.” This 
												also signifies how necessary it 
												was, to the purifying our 
												hearts, that satisfaction should 
												be made to divine justice. This 
												sprinkling of the blood put 
												virtue into the ashes.
 
 Verse 5-6
 Numbers 19:5-6. One shall burn 
												the heifer in his sight — This 
												typified the extreme sufferings 
												of our Lord, both in soul and 
												body, as a sacrifice made by 
												fire. Cedar-wood, hyssop, and 
												scarlet — These were used in the 
												cleansing of lepers, (Leviticus 
												14:6-7,) and were all here 
												burned, and, as it were, offered 
												to God, that they might be 
												sanctified to this holy use in 
												future.
 
 Verse 7
 Numbers 19:7. The priest shall 
												be unclean — Partly to teach us 
												the imperfection of the 
												Levitical priesthood, in which 
												the priest himself was defiled 
												by some parts of his work, and 
												partly to show that Christ 
												himself, though he had no sin of 
												his own, yet was reputed by men, 
												and judged by God, as a sinful 
												person, by reason of our sins, 
												which were laid upon him.
 
 Verse 9
 Numbers 19:9. A man shall gather 
												up the ashes — The ashes of the 
												heifer were separated as well as 
												they could be from the ashes of 
												the wood wherewith it was 
												burned, were pounded and sifted, 
												and laid up for the use of the 
												congregation as there was 
												occasion, not only for that 
												generation, but for posterity; 
												for the ashes of this one 
												heifer, the Jews tell us, were 
												sufficient to season as many 
												vessels of water as the people 
												of Israel would need for many 
												ages. Nay, they say this one 
												served till the captivity, near 
												one thousand years, and that 
												there never was another heifer 
												burned fill the time of Ezra. 
												But to this tradition of theirs, 
												grounded probably on the silence 
												of ancient records, there seems 
												to be no good reason to give 
												credit, since, in the latter 
												ages of their church, when they 
												had more full records, they find 
												an account of eight burned 
												between Ezra’s time and the 
												destruction of the second 
												temple, which was only a space 
												of about five hundred years. In 
												the sacrifice of the body and 
												blood of Christ, however, 
												offered only once for all, we 
												have an inexhaustible fund of 
												merit, to which, by faith, his 
												church may have recourse from 
												generation to generation, for 
												the purification of their 
												consciences from dead works.
 
 Verse 12
 Numbers 19:12. He shall purify 
												himself with it — With the water 
												of separation. On the third day 
												— To typify Christ’s 
												resurrection on that day, by 
												which we are cleansed or 
												sanctified.
 
 Verse 13
 Numbers 19:13. Whosoever 
												toucheth — If this transgression 
												be done presumptuously; for if 
												it was done ignorantly, he was 
												only to offer a sacrifice. 
												Defileth the tabernacle — By 
												approaching to it in his 
												uncleanness: for holy things or 
												places were ceremonially defiled 
												with the touch of any unclean 
												person or thing. Is upon him — 
												He continues in his guilt, not 
												now to be washed away by this 
												water, but to be punished by 
												cutting off.
 
 Verse 16-17
 Numbers 19:16-17. With a sword — 
												Or by any other violent way. 
												Running water — Waters flowing 
												from a spring or river, which 
												are the purest. These manifestly 
												signify God’s Spirit, which is 
												oft compared to water, and by 
												which alone, through the 
												sacrifice of Christ, true 
												purification is obtained. Those 
												who promise themselves benefit 
												by the righteousness of Christ, 
												while they submit not to the 
												influence of his Spirit, do but 
												deceive themselves, for they 
												cannot be purified by the ashes, 
												otherwise than in the running 
												water.
 
 Verse 18
 Numbers 19:18. A clean person 
												shall take hyssop — In allusion 
												to this David prays, Purge me 
												with hyssop. Faith is the bunch 
												of hyssop, wherewith the 
												conscience is sprinkled and the 
												heart purified. And the blood of 
												Christ, being applied by faith, 
												is termed, (Hebrews 12:24,) the 
												blood of sprinkling, and with it 
												we are said to be sprinkled from 
												an evil conscience, (Hebrews 
												10:22,) that is, we are freed 
												from the burden of distress, 
												which arises from a sense of our 
												guilt. And it is foretold that 
												Christ should sprinkle many 
												nations, Isaiah 52:15.
 
 Verse 20-21
 Numbers 19:20-21. That shall not 
												purify himself — Shall 
												contemptuously refuse to submit 
												to this way of purification. 
												Shall wash his clothes — Because 
												he is unclean. It is strange, 
												that the same water should 
												cleanse one person, and defile 
												another. But God would have it 
												so, to teach us that it did not 
												cleanse by any virtue in itself, 
												or in the work done, but only by 
												virtue of God’s appointment; and 
												to show that the efficacy of 
												God’s ordinances doth not depend 
												upon the person or quality of 
												his ministers, because the same 
												person who was polluted himself 
												could and did, in the use of 
												God’s appointed means, cleanse 
												others. He that toucheth the 
												water — Either by sprinkling of 
												it, or by being sprinkled with 
												it; for even he that was 
												cleansed by it was not fully 
												cleansed as soon as he was 
												sprinkled, but only at the even 
												of that day.
 |