| THE THIRD LAYMEN’S CONVENTION     This was the last of the Laymen’s Conventions held 
  before the General Conference at which it was expected that the appeals of the 
  expelled brethren would be heard. In some respects it was the most important 
  of them all. - It reaffirmed the declarations of the preceding Conventions. It 
  also provided that from each district in the Conference laymen should be 
  appointed to cooperate with the ministers in the direction and management of 
  the Bands, maintaining that in the formation of these Bands they were 
  introducing no innovation antagonistic to the Methodist Episcopal Church, but 
  that they were acting in full harmony with its established policy.       It was this Convention that memorialized the 
  General Conference, to meet the following May, to the effect that the judicial 
  action of the Genesee Conference in the various expulsions which had occurred 
  should be carefully investigated by that body, and also for such an amendment 
  of the judicial law of the Church as should secure to both ministers and 
  laymen the right of trial by an impartial committee. This Memorial was finally 
  signed by more than fifteen hundred of the laymen of the Conference before its 
  presentation to the General Conference.       The Convention also petitioned the General 
  Conference to the effect that a new chapter should be inserted in the 
  Discipline, such as would exclude from membership all persons guilty of 
  holding, buying or selling, or in any way using a human being as a slave. 
  These and several other actions passed by this Convention had a very important 
  bearing upon the ultimate formation of the Free Methodist Church. Hence it is 
  important to give an account of its proceedings here.       The following partial report of this third 
  Convention is gleaned from a copy of the Olean Advertiser, which 
  published quite an extended and accurate account of it: 
 PROCEEDINGS OF THE LAYMEN’S CONVENTION
    
    Of the M. B. Church, Genesee Conference, held in the Presbyterian 
    Church, 0lean, Wednesday and Thursday, Feb. 1st and 2nd, 1860.
      A Convention of the Laymen of the Methodist 
    Episcopal Church, of the Genesee Conference, assembled, pursuant to a call, 
    which we published, at the Presbyterian Church, in this village. The 
    Convention was large, every charge or congregation in the Conference being 
    represented. It was at first intended to hold the Convention In the 
    Methodist Church in this village; but Judge Green, upon the application of a 
    member of the Church, granted an injunction restraining and forbidding the 
    Trustees to open their edifice for this purpose. With a commendable 
    liberality, the Trustees of the Presbyterian Church tendered the use of 
    their house for the holding of the Convention.       At 10 o’clock, on Wednesday morning, Abner I. 
    Wood, President of the Laymen’s Convention, called the delegates to order, 
    and S. K. J. Chesbrough, Secretary, assumed the duties of his office.       The Convention opened with prayer by Mr. S. C. 
    Springer, of Gowanda; after which the Secretary, Mr. Chesbrough, read the 
    call of the Convention. He also read a letter from D. W. Tinkham, expressing 
    the strong sympathy of that gentleman with the object of the Convention.       Mr. Chesbrough presented a lengthy Memorial to 
    the General Conference, upon the subject of the expelled ministers, which 
    was read, and laid upon the table for the present.       Later the Memorial which was read by Mr. 
    Chesbrough at the opening of the Convention was discussed, and the following 
    finally substituted: “PETITION
    
    “To the Bishops and Members of the General Conference of the M. B. 
    Church, to be held in Buffalo, N. Y., May 1, 1860.
    “REVEREND FATHERS AND BRETHREN:       “We, the undersigned, members of the Methodist 
    Episcopal Church, in the bounds of the Genesee Conference, respectfully 
    represent to your Reverend body, that a very unpleasant state of things 
    prevails in the Church throughout this Conference. This difficulty has grown 
    out of the judicial action of the Conference. Many honestly believe this 
    action to have been wrong and oppressive. We, therefore, ask your Reverend 
    body to give to the judicial action of the Genesee Conference, by which six 
    of the ministers, to wit: B. T. Roberts, J. McCreery, J. A. Wells, Wm. 
    Cooley, L. Stiles, Jr., and C. D. Burlingham, have been expelled from the 
    Conference and the Church, a full and careful investigation, trusting you 
    will come to such decision as righteousness demands. We also ask your 
    Reverend body so to amend the judicial law of the Church, as to secure to 
    the ministers and members the right of trial by an impartial committee.”       A motion was adopted, authorizing the chair to 
    appoint a committee of five, to procure a sufficient number of copies of the 
    Memorial to be printed for circulation in the Conference. W. - J. Coigrove, 
    S. K. J. Chesbrough, S. C. Springer, Rev. J. A. Wells, and Rev. B. T. 
    Roberts, were appointed such committee.       The following petition to the General Conference 
    was read and adopted: “To the Bishops and Members of the General Conference of the M. E. 
    Church, to be held in Buffalo, N. Y., May 1st, 1860. “REVEREND FATHERS AND BRETHREN:       “Inasmuch as there are now known to be, in the 
    Slave States, many members of the Methodist Episcopal Church who hold their 
    fellow-beings, and even their brethren in Christ, as slaves, contrary to 
    natural justice and the Gospel of Christ; and       “WHEREAS, We believe the buying, selling, or 
    holding of a human being as property, is a sin against God, and should in 
    no-wise be tolerated in the Church of Christ: therefore,       “We, the undersigned, members of the Methodist 
    Episcopal Church in the --------charge, Genesee Conference, would earnestly 
    petition your Reverend body to place a chapter in the Discipline of the M. 
    E. Church that will exclude all persons from the M. E. Church or her 
    communion, who shall be guilty of holding, buying or selling, or in any way 
    using a human being as a slave.”       Rev. B. T. Roberts said that his opinions on 
    slavery were not changed. He had always been an anti-slavery man; and the 
    first speech he had ever made was an anti-slavery speech. He was opposed to 
    its being in the Church; it had no more right there than the devil had. He 
    said it had been reported that he had reported that he had received a letter 
    from a Presiding Elder, stating that he had better drop the hobby of 
    Holiness, and take up the Slavery Issue. He had never received any such 
    letter. He also said:       “The Genesee Conference, in former days, was 
    thoroughly antislavery. It seems, by the returns of the last Conference, 
    that there is a change somewhere. The report on slavery was permitted to get 
    into the hands of the committee; and it seems they were either afraid or 
    ashamed to publish it in their minutes.”       The Reverend gentleman proceeded at some length, 
    and declared that if the Church would only take hold of the matter in the 
    right way, and in the right spirit, slavery would soon be extirpated from 
    the land. He declared his determination to labor for such a result as long 
    as he should live.       Rev. J. McCreery, and others, followed in a 
    similar strain, and hoped that the Church would do her duty. [Resolution 
    adopted].       The following resolution was also adopted:       “Resolved, That we are highly pleased 
    with the appearance of the Earnest Christian. The articles, thus far, 
    prove it to be just what is needed at this time, when a conforming and 
    superficial Christianity is prevailing everywhere. We hail it with delight 
    among us; and we pledge ourselves to use our exertions to extend its 
    circulation.”       At the afternoon sitting the following 
    resolution was offered and finally adopted:       “Resolved, That we reiterate our 
    unfaltering attachment to the M. E. Church, while we protest against, and 
    repudiate its abuses and iniquitous administration, by which we have been 
    aggrieved, and the Church scandalized. Our controversy is in favor of the 
    doctrines and Discipline of the Church, and against temporary 
    mal-administration. And we exhort our brethren everywhere not to secede, or 
    withdraw from the Church, or be persuaded into any other ecclesiastical 
    organization; but to form themselves into Bands, after the example of early 
    Methodism, and remain in the Church until expelled.” 
      There seems to have been a Committee on 
  Resolutions, and that Committee presented the following report:  
      “PREAMBLE. God deals with us as individuals. No man or 
    body of men can take the responsibility of our actions. It is a Bible 
    doctrine, very clearly taught, that ‘every one must give account of himself 
    to God.’
      “Ministers cannot take into their hands the 
    keeping of our consciences. The right of private judgment lies at the 
    foundation of the great Protestant Reformation. It forms the basis of all 
    true religion. No person who does not act and think for himself can enjoy 
    either the sanctifying or justifying grace of God. When John Wesley was told 
    that he could not continue in the Church of England, because he could ‘not 
    in principle submit to her determinations,’ he replied, ‘If that were 
    necessary, I could not be a member of any Church under Heaven; for I must 
    still insist upon the right of private judgment. I cannot yield either 
    implicit faith or obedience to any man or number of men under heaven.’
          “This is equally true of every honest man. In 
    our Church, the government is vested exclusively in the ministry; the 
    Bishops appointing the preachers to whatever charges they please, and thus 
    having the power to influence them to a great extent, if not to absolutely 
    control them, by the hope of obtaining preferment, if they are submissive, 
    and the fear of being placed in an obscure position, if they do not carry 
    out the will of their superiors. They are elected by the ministers, and are 
    responsible alone to the men who are thus completely dependent upon them for 
    their position in the Church. The General Conference, possessing all the 
    power to make laws for the Churches, is composed exclusively of ministers, 
    elected by ministers. The Annual Conference, which says, who shall preach 
    and who shall not, is made up of ministers. The Book Agents, wielding a 
    mighty, pecuniary influence, are ministers. The official editors, 
    controlling the public sentiment of the Church, are ministers. The same 
    principle is carried out in the administration upon our circuits and 
    stations. The preacher sent on—it may be, in opposition to the wishes of a 
    large majority of the members —appoints all the leaders, nominates the 
    stewards, and licenses the exhorters. If he wishes to expel a member, he 
    selects the committee, and presides over the trial as judge. He goes out 
    with them, and sees that they make up their verdict as he desires.       “The only check to this immense clerical 
    power—without a parallel, unless it is in the Church of Rome—consists in the 
    right of the laity to refuse to support those ministers who abuse their 
    trust, and show themselves unworthy of confidence. This only remedy in our 
    power against clerical oppression we have felt bound to apply.       “The course of those members of the Genesee 
    Conference, known as the ‘Regency party,’ In screening one another when 
    lying under the imputation of gross and flagrant immoralities; and ha 
    expelling from the Conference and the Church devoted ministers of the 
    Gospel, whose only crime consisted in the ability and success with which 
    they taught and enforced the doctrine of Holiness, and the fidelity with 
    which they labored to secure the exclusion of slaveholders from the 
    Church,—this course, so contrary to the spirit of the Gospel, as honest men 
    going to judgment, we felt called upon to discountenance. We dare not give 
    these ministers Godspeed in their bloody work, lest we be partakers in their 
    evil deeds. We accordingly voted, in our Conventions, that we could not 
    sustain these preachers who were putting down the work of God.       “These efforts of ours to correct great evils 
    have been met by persecutions worthy of the priests of Rome in her darkest 
    days. Men of approved piety of long standing, whose prayers and efforts and 
    money have been freely given to promote the interests of the Church, have 
    been expelled from the communion of their choice for having dared to act 
    according to their convictions; therefore,       “Resolved, That we heartily indorse the 
    sentiments contained in the Preambles and Resolutions passed at the Albion 
    Conventions (December, 1858, and November, 1859). The position then taken, 
    we this day unhesitatingly affirm, in our estimation, to be right Convinced 
    more than ever, that we need to act as one body in this matter, we hereby 
    pledge ourselves unflinchingly and uncompromisingly to stand by the 
    principles then laid down; and to sustain, by our sympathy and our aid, our 
    brethren in the ministry who have been the subjects of a heartless and 
    wicked proscription.       “Resolved, That we heartily condemn the 
    practice pursued by many of the Regency preachers, in reading out members as 
    withdrawn from the Church, without even the form of a trial, or without even 
    laboring with them. We deem it an act of outrage upon our rights as members 
    of the Church, contrary to the Discipline, and in direct opposition to the 
    Spirit of Christ. We truly extend to our brethren and sisters who have thus 
    been illegally read out of our beloved Zion, the right hand of fellowship. 
    We rejoice that the ‘Lamb’s Book of Life’ is beyond the reach of human 
    hands. And while they continue faithful followers of Jesus, whether in or 
    out of the Church, we hail them as members of the body of Christ.”       The preamble was unanimously adopted. 
      The resolutions were discussed at considerable 
  length, those who spoke, however, being of the same mind; then they were 
  adopted unanimously.  
      At the second day’s proceedings the following 
    resolution was offered by S. K. J. Chesbrough:
      “WHEREAS, The wants of the cause of God demand 
    the holding of Camp-meetings, General Quarterly Meetings, and other general 
    gatherings of our people, in the several Districts, demanding judicious and 
    general counsel and cooperation, in appointing and conducting the same; 
    therefore,       “Resolved, That the following laymen and 
    local preachers, together with the traveling preachers appointed by this 
    Convention, be an executive council in each District respectively, to 
    appoint and superintend all Camp-meetings, General Quarterly Meetings, and 
    such other general meetings as they may judge proper; and in the interim of 
    the sessions of this Convention, to take the general oversight of the work 
    within the bounds of their respective districts.”       Adopted and appointments made.       The following resolution, introduced by S. K. J. 
    Chesbrough, was also unanimously adopted by a rising vote:       “Resolved, That we look with lively 
    interest on the denominational position of the Free Methodist Church of 
    Albion, under the pastoral care of Rev. L. Stiles, Jr.; that we rejoice in 
    her prosperity; that we hail her as a welcome co-laborer in the vineyard of 
    our common Master, and as a worthy member in the sisterhood of Evangelical 
    Churches.”      After a few other motions and resolutions of a 
  less important character had been finally adopted the Convention adjourned.
   |