| AS GOOD AS GOD.It is objected that those who profess holiness claim to be as 
			good as God.
 This statement is as false as it could possibly be. Professors of 
			holiness never make such a claim; on the contrary they constantly 
			assert that they are not and never will be divine nor as good as 
			divinity. This is proven from the following considerations
 
 I. The nature of God himself.
 
				God is goodness. He has in himself independent of any other 
				being the fountain of never failing goodness. No man ever makes 
				such a claim for himself, but all holiness people constantly 
				declare that any goodness in them is given by God. God is love. This is his nature and ever will be. He is the 
				very personification of love. Every professor of holiness 
				declares "I love because he first loved me." God is perfect. That is, in him every moral attribute is so 
				complete that there is no possibility of adding any perfection 
				to his character either in kind or degree. Holiness people 
				continually bewail their littleness and are always seeking 
				greater attainments. God is perfect in knowledge, wisdom, power and glory. 
				Nothing ever will add to him or detract from him; we can never 
				teach him or hide anything from him. The eyes of the Lord run to 
				and fro through all the earth beholding the evil and the good. 
				Professors of holiness are like other men, they lack knowledge, 
				are liable to be unwise, are weak and are even called the filth 
				of the world.  II. Holiness people not only do not claim to be as good as God 
			but they assert that there are other beings that excel them in 
			holiness and that there are laws that they cannot fulfill.
 1. They do not claim to keep the angelic law of perfect obedience 
			the Adamic or Mosaic laws of perfect innocence.
 
				The prejudices of our opponents are increased by their 
				confounding Adamic and Christian perfection; two perfections 
				these, which are as distinct as the garden of Eden and the 
				Christian church. Adamic perfection came from God our Creator in 
				paradise, before any trial of Adam's faithful obedience: and 
				Christian perfection comes from God our Redeemer and Sanctifier 
				in the Christian church, after a severe trial of the obedience 
				of faith. Adamic perfection might be lost by doing despite to 
				the preserving love of God our Creator; and Christian perfection 
				may be lost by doing despite to the redeeming love of God our 
				Saviour. Adamic perfection extended to the whole man; his body 
				was perfectly sound in all its parts, and his soul in all its 
				powers, but Christian perfection extends chiefly to the will, 
				which is the capital moral power of the soul; leaving the 
				understanding ignorant of ten thousand things, and the body 
				"dead because of sin." * 2. They do not claim what some call sinless perfection unless the 
			word "sinless" is properly defined. 
				We believe that although adult, established believers, or 
				perfect Christians, may admit of many involuntary mistakes, 
				errors, and faults; and of many involuntary improprieties of 
				speech and behavior; yet, so long as their will be bent upon 
				doing God's will; so long as they 'fulfil the law of liberty' by 
				pure love, they do not sin according to the gospel; because, 
				evangelically speaking, 'sin is the transgression,' and 'love is 
				the fulfilling,' of 'that law.' Far, then, from thinking that 
				there is the least absurdity in saying daily, 'Vouchsafe to keep 
				us this day without sin,' we doubt not but in the believers who 
				'walk in the light as Christ is in the light,' that deep 
				petition is answered, the righteousness of the law which they 
				are under is fulfilled; and, of consequence, an evangelically 
				sinless perfection is daily experienced. I say, evangelically 
				sinless,' because, without the word 'evangelically,' the phrase 
				'sinless perfection' gives an occasion of caviling to those who 
				seek it; as Mr. Wesley intimates in the following quotation, 
				which is taken from his Plain Account of Christian Perfection:-- 
				"To explain myself a little farther on this head: 1. Not only 
				'sin,' properly so called, that is, a voluntary transgression of 
				a known law, but 'sin,' improperly so called, that is, an 
				involuntary transgression of a divine law, known or unknown, 
				needs the atoning blood. 2. I believe there is no such 
				perfection in this life as excludes these involuntary 
				transgressions, which I apprehend to be naturally consequent on 
				the ignorance and mistakes inseparable from mortality. 3. 
				Therefore, 'sinless perfection' is a phrase I never use, lest I 
				should seem to contradict myself. 4. I believe a person filled 
				with the love of God is still liable to these involuntary 
				transgressions -- such transgressions you may call 'sins,' if 
				you please; I do not, for the reasons above-mentioned.
				** 3. Persons who profess holiness do not claim to have attained 
			such a measure of grace and of the fullness of the Spirit that they 
			cannot grow in grace. 
				Another capital mistake lies at the root of the opposition 
				which our Calvinian brethren make against Christian perfection. 
				They imagine that, upon our principles, the grace of an adult 
				Christian is like the body of an adult man, which can grow no 
				more. But this consequence flows from their fancy, and not from 
				our doctrine. We exhort the strongest believers to 'grow up into 
				Christ in all things;' asserting that there is no holiness, and 
				no happiness in heaven, much less upon earth, which do not admit 
				of a growth, except the holiness and the happiness of God 
				himself; because, in the very nature of things, a being 
				absolutely perfect, and in every sense infinite, can never have 
				anything added to him. But infinite additions can be made to 
				beings every way finite, such as glorified saints and holy 
				angels are. *** III. Holiness people do not lay claim to absolute perfection, for 
			the following reasons:-- 
				They are compassed about with infirmities, Their physical 
				bodies are weak. Sickness and disease prey upon them. Because of 
				their weakness they are often unable to do the things they 
				desire. Their fleshly natures possess appetites and desires which 
				must be held in check, mortified or denied or they will become 
				too strong, or take too prominent a place in the life and 
				eventually overthrow spirituality. Paul says: "But I keep under 
				my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, 
				when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway." 
				And again, "Mortify therefore your members which are upon the 
				earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil 
				concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry." Their minds are infirm. Holiness does not teach a man the 
				measurements of the heavens, the natures and virtues of plants, 
				the laws of physics nor the intricacies of mathematical 
				calculations. Holiness does not even insure that its possessor 
				will be able to pass judgment as to what consequence will follow 
				any given antecedent without error. That is, they are not 
				infallible in judgment and do not claim to be. Their spirits are infirm. An infirmity is defined as an 
				involuntary lack of power. All are free to admit that they would 
				be glad to be able to sense God's will and requirements more 
				readily than they do. Their spiritual eyes are open but they do 
				not always see all things clearly. Although growth in grace 
				assures clearer vision yet perfect vision will never be given 
				till they enter heaven.  IV. In what particular then do they claim to be perfect? 
				They do claim that their hearts are cleansed from the 
				inbeing of sin. They do claim that their motives are pure. When they know 
				the will of God they desire to do it. They claim to be made perfect in love. This is a Bible term 
				and is the name of a Christian experience. Perfect love means 
				love with no admixture of any contrary affection. If there is 
				any admixture the love is not perfect. They do claim to be perfect according to the law of liberty 
				by which they shall be judged, "So speak ye, and so do, as they 
				that shall be judged by the law of liberty." -- James 2:12. This 
				law admits that human infirmities may exist even after the heart 
				is cleansed from sin.  In view of all these acknowledgments of weakness and infirmity no 
			one can truthfully accuse another of claiming divine prerogatives 
			simply because he professes entire sanctification. |