| CLOSE OF ELISHA'S PUBLIC MINISTRY: 
					THE BEGINNING OF JUDGMENT The Shunammite on her 
					Return from Philistia restored to her Property — Elisha's 
					Visit to Damascus — The Embassy of Hazael — Prediction of 
					Future Judgment through him — The Murder of Ben-hadad and 
					Accession of Hazael. 
					(2 Kings 8:1-15.)     
					
					The two narratives which follow that of the siege of Samaria 
					may be 
					characterized as in some sense supplementary to it. On the 
					one hand, they 
					mark the relations between Elisha and Joram; and on the 
					other, those 
					between the prophet and Syria. They also close what seems 
					the more 
					personal account of Elisha's activity. After that we have 
					only an account 
					of his death and burial (chap. 13.), drawn, as we suppose, 
					from the same 
					"memoirs" to which the whole of this series is due; the 
					reference to 
					Elisha's activity in the anointing of Jehu (chap. 9.) 
					forming part of the 
					more general history. Accordingly we again remind ourselves 
					that what is 
					about to be described must not be regarded as following in 
					strict 
					chronological succession what had preceded, but rather as in 
					internal 
					connection with it. 
      
					The first narrative introduces once more the Shunammite and 
					her heaven- 
					given, heaven restored son, although in circumstances far 
					different from 
					those in which we first knew them. Indirectly we learn and 
					mark that the 
					relations between the prophet and the family of Shunem had 
					not ceased 
					with the restoration of the child to life, although Holy 
					Scripture has not 
					preserved any record of such intercourse. And this also is 
					instructive as 
					regards Bible history. Further, we mark the affectionate 
					interest of Elisha, 
					and his care for the outward well-being of this family. 
					Among the other 
					dealings of God with Israel we learn that He "called for a 
					famine" — a 
					most emphatic expression (comp. Psalms 105:16; Haggai 1:11). 
					This 
					dearth was to last for seven out of the twelve years of 
					Joram' s reign. 
					Before its commencement the prophet "had spoken" to the 
					Shunammite, 
					warning her to betake herself to any place outside the land 
					of Israel where 
					she might be able to secure a temporary home; and "the woman 
					had arisen 
					
					
					
					
					
					and done 1 after the saying of the man of God." Although we 
					have evidence 
					that this famine pressed severely on the people (comp. 
					4:38), yet the 
					advice of the prophet must have been determined by special
					
					circumstances. From the absence of any reference to him, it 
					is probable 
					that the Shunammite had lost her husband, and with him her 
					mainstay in 
					times of trouble and difficulty. 
      
					We are told that she went to the land of the Philistines 
					probably as 
					
					that nearest to her home, and at the same time least likely 
					to suffer, both 
					on account of its fertility and its easy communication with 
					grain producing 
					Egypt. When the predicted seven years of famine ended, the 
					woman who, 
					as the original expressly marks, had only gone "to sojourn 
					as a stranger," 
					returned to her home at Shunem. But here her faith, which 
					had led her so 
					literally to obey the words of the prophet, was to receive a 
					rude shock. 
					"Her house," to which so many loving and sacred memories 
					attached, and 
					"her land" — her own and her child's property — were 
					occupied by 
					strangers. 
      
					We remember the proud feeling of independence with which she 
					had on a 
					former occasion declined Elisha' s offer to speak for her to 
					the king (2 
					Kings 4:13), since she dwelt among her own people. But since 
					then, and in 
					the troubles connected with famine and Syrian invasion, 
					times had sadly 
					changed. And in the circumstances it seems scarcely less 
					indicative of the 
					Shunammite' s independence of character, that she now 
					appealed directly 
					to the king, not for favor, but for justice. It was surely 
					in the good 
					providing of God, Who ordereth all things wisely and well, 
					that the 
					Shunammite addressed her appeal to the king just as he was 
					talking with 
					Gehazi, and the latter at his request was telling all the 
					great things that 
					Elisha had done. But we cannot infer from this conversation 
					that their 
					meeting occurred before the healing of Naaman, after which 
					Gehazi was 
					smitten with life-long leprosy, since, although lepers were 
					banished from 
					the cities, all intercourse with them was not prohibited, 
					especially under 
					such peculiar circumstances. On the other hand, it was 
					evidently the 
					period when the authority of the prophet with the king was 
					at its highest, 
					and hence either after the capture of the Syrians in Samaria 
					(2 Kings 6:21), 
					or, as we think, after the fulfillment of Elisha' s 
					prediction of the relief of 
					Samaria, and the death of the disbelieving "lord." This 
					would best accord 
					with the present narrative. In any case, the appearance of 
					the woman with 
					
					
					
					
					
					her son during Gehazi's conversation would not only confirm 
					its truth, but 
					naturally augment the interest of the king in her complaint. 
					And so he 
					immediately ordered not only the restoration of her 
					property, but a return, 
					probably from the royal treasury, of the value of the 
					produce of the land 
					during the previous years. But to us and to all time this 
					history is chiefly 
					interesting as showing how the obedience of faith will, 
					despite trials or 
					appearances to the contrary, be met by the faithful care of 
					the God of 
					promise — and still further, how God will not allow the day 
					of His people 
					to set in trouble, but cause the light to break forth at 
					eventide. 
      
					The second narrative in this history shows how the name and 
					work of 
					Elisha were known, not only in Israel, but beyond it, even 
					in hostile Syria. 
					This, after what we have already learned, cannot surprise 
					us. Although 
					there is not any express statement to that effect, we cannot 
					but connect 
					the journey of Elisha "towards Damascus," 
					2 with the 
					commission formerly 
					given to Elijah to anoint Hazael king over Syria (1 Kings 
					19: 15). This may 
					help us to understand that the Word of God has a wider than 
					the barely 
					literal application which so often tends to perplex the 
					superficial reader. It 
					also shows that its fulfillment may be delayed, and when 
					made, come in 
					other manner than was expected; and, lastly, that the 
					prophets may for 
					many years have borne about the painful secret of some 
					trouble to come 
					— forbearing to take any part till the moment for action, or 
					rather for their 
					obedience, was indicated to them from above. 
      
					It was, surely, not an accidental circumstance that when 
					Elisha arrived in 
					Syria Ben-hadad was on that sick-bed from which his 
					treacherous servant 
					intended he should never rise. For the prophet was not to 
					come until all 
					was ready and prepared for the deed by which Hazael would 
					ascend the 
					throne of Syria, that while in its sequences necessarily 
					connected with the 
					judgments foretold upon Israel, yet no part of the incentive 
					to the crime 
					could be imputed to the agency of the Divine messenger. 
					Evidently, if 
					Hazael had not intended to murder his master, and to pretend 
					that he had 
					died of his disease, the words of Elisha would have had no 
					meaning, nor 
					could they have suggested to him his crime. 
      
					On hearing of the near approach of the great prophet of 
					Israel, Ben-hadad 
					charged Hazael, probably his vizier or chief general, to 
					meet Elisha, and 
					inquire through him of Jehovah, whether he would recover 
					from his 
					
					
					
					
					
					sickness. After the manner of the time, Hazael went to meet 
					the prophet 
					with a present. We are not to understand that those forty 
					camels which 
					bore "of every good thing of Damascus," were literally fully 
					laden. This 
					magnifying of a present by distributing and laying it on a 
					great many 
					bearers or beasts of burden, is characteristic of the East, 
					and is not 
					uncommonly witnessed in our own days. Hazael delivered his 
					master's 
					message with unblushing hypocrisy. But Elisha had read his 
					purpose, and 
					replied in language which, while it unmasked, could never 
					have suggested 
					his murderous scheme: "Go, say to him, [viz. as thou 
					intendest to do] 
					Thou shalt surely live; howbeit Jehovah has shown me that he 
					shall surely 
					die." And as we recall the hypocritical words by which 
					Hazael had tried to 
					disguise his purpose and deceive the prophet, we feel that 
					this was the 
					most fitting answer to his pretended humility and care. 
      
					Yet this was only the beginning of what Elisha had to say to 
					Hazael. "And 
					he [Elisha] steadied his face, and set it till he [Hazael] 
					was ashamed," when 
					reading not only his inmost thoughts, but his future history 
					also, the 
					prophet burst into weeping. When Hazael inquired as to the 
					reason of his 
					tears, Elisha told the terrible cruelties which he knew the 
					Syrian would 
					perpetrate upon Israel. The mock humility of Hazel's answer: 
					"But what 
					is thy servant, the dog, that he should do this great 
					thing?" reveals at least 
					the spirit in which he contemplated such deeds against 
					Israel. If Hazael had 
					still thought to deceive Elisha, the announcement that God 
					had shown to 
					his prophet Hazael as king of Syria, must have convinced him 
					that disguise 
					was useless. Little more requires to be told. Hazael 
					returned to his master, 
					and gave him the lying assurance of recovery, as Elisha had 
					foretold. Then 
					as in his sore sickness Ben-hadad lay prostrate and 
					helpless, Hazael laid 
					upon his face a coverlet which had been soaked and made 
					heavy with 
					water. And so Ben-hadad died, and his murderer, whose crime 
					remained 
					probably unknown, ascended the throne. 
      
					The accession of Hazael was only part of the burden of 
					judgment upon 
					Israel which had been announced to Elijah. The other part 
					was the 
					usurpation of the throne of Israel by Jehu. With this 
					twofold accession 
					began the decay of the northern kingdom of Israel. Presently 
					we shall read 
					(10:32). "In those days Jehovah began to cut Israel short; 
					and Hazael 
					smote them in all the coasts of Israel," — a smiting which 
					included the loss 
					of the entire territory east of the Jordan. And we believe 
					that it was to 
					
					
					
					
					
					declare, perhaps to warn of, this judgment upon Israel, that 
					Elisha was 
					sent to Damascus, and made to have this interview with 
					Hazael. 
      
					For Divine judgment cannot be arrested, though it may be 
					deferred, and 
					what Israel had sown when on the morrow of the decisive 
					contest on 
					Carmel it cast out Elijah, that would it reap, when, 
					notwithstanding all 
					mercies shown, the son of Ahab and Jezebel could order, 
					though he dared 
					not carry out, the execution of Elisha. They would have none 
					of His 
					prophets, however clearly their mission was attested of God; 
					nay, rather, 
					they would have none of that God Whose prophets Elijah and 
					Elisha had 
					been. And yet in faithfulness God would reveal the coming 
					judgment to 
					His servants, and through them to Israel. 
      
					But quite a peculiar feeling comes over us in these far-off 
					islands of the 
					West, when now, thousands of years after these events, we 
					stand before 
					the black obelisk on which this part of the history of 
					ancient Assyria is 
					recorded, 3 and there read the names of Ben-hadad and of 
					Hazael of 
					Damascus — the former in connection with "Ahab of Jezreel," 
					who was at 
					one time his ally against Assyria; the latter, as humbly 
					offering rich tribute 
					to the king of Assyria, as also does Jehu, who is styled 
					"the son of Omri" 
					(the founder of the dynasty succeeding that of Omri). And 
					here these 
					histories commingle, and the records of the one will be 
					found to throw 
					welcome light upon those of the other. 
					       |