NATIONAL DELIVERANCE--THE PHILISTINES
SUBDUED.
1Sa 7:10-17.
IT must have been with feelings very different from those of their
last encounter, when the ark of God was carried into the battle,
that the host of Israel now faced the Philistine army near Mizpeh.
Then they had only the symbol of God's gracious presence, now they
had the reality. Then their spiritual guides were the wicked Hophni
and Phinehas; now their guide was holy Samuel. Then they had rushed
into the fight in thoughtless unconcern about their sins; now they
had confessed them, and through the blood of sprinkling they had
obtained a sense of forgiveness. Then they were puffed up by a vain
presumption; now they were animated by a calm but confident hope.
Then their advance was hallowed by no prayer; now the cry of needy
children had gone up from God's faithful servant. In fact, the
battle with the Philistines had already been fought by Samuel on his
knees. There can be no more sure token of success than this. Are we
engaged in conflict with our own besetting sins? Or are we
contending against scandalous transgression in the world around us?
Let us first fight the battle on our knees. If we are victorious
there we need have little fear of victory in the other battle.
It was as Samuel was offering up the burnt-offering that the
Philistines drew near to battle against Israel. There was an unseen
ladder that day between earth and heaven, on which the angels of God
ascended and descended as in Jacob's vision at Bethel. The smoke of
the burnt-offering carried up to God the confession and contrition
of the people, their reliance on God's method of atonement, and
their prayer for His pardon and His blessing. The great thunder with
which God thundered on the Philistines carried down from God the
answer and the needed help. There is no need for supposing that the
thunder was supernatural. It was an instance of what is so common, a
natural force adapted to the purpose of an answer to prayer. What
seems to have occurred is this: a vehement thunder-storm had
gathered a little to the east, and now broke, probably with violent
wind, in the faces of the Philistines, who were advancing up the
heights against Mizpeh. Unable to face such a terrific war of the
elements, the Philistines would turn round, placing their backs to
the storm. The men of Israel, but little embarrassed by it, since it
came from behind them, and gave the greater momentum to their force,
rushed on the embarrassed enemy, and drove them before them like
smoke before the wind. It was just as in former days - God arose,
and His enemies were scattered, and they also that hated Him fled
before Him. The storm before which the Philistines cowered was like
the pillar of fire which had guided Israel through the desert.
Jehovah was still the God of Israel; the God of Jacob was once more
his refuge.
We have said that this thunderstorm may have been quite a natural
phenomenon. Natural, but not casual. Though natural, it was God's
answer to Samuel's prayer. But how could this have been? If it was a
natural storm, if it was the result of natural law, of atmospheric
conditions the operation of which was fixed and certain, it must
have taken place whether Samuel prayed or not. Undoubtedly. But the
very fact that the laws of nature are fixed and certain, that their
operation is definite and regular, enables the great Lord of
Providence to make use of them in the natural course of things, for
the purpose of answering prayer. For this fact, the uniformity of
natural law, enables the Almighty, who sees and plans the end from
the beginning, to frame a comprehensive scheme of Providence, that
shall not only work out the final result in His time and way, but
that shall also work out every intermediate result precisely as He
designs and desires. "Known unto God are all His works from the
beginning of the world." Now if God has so adjusted the scheme of
Providence that the final result of the whole shall wonderfully
accomplish His grand design, may He not, must He not, have so
adjusted it that every intermediate part shall work out some
intermediate design? It is only those who have an unworthy
conception of omniscience and omnipotence that can doubt this.
Surely if there is a general Providence, there must be a special
Providence. If God guides the whole. He must also guide the parts.
Every part of the scheme must fall out according to His plan, and
may thus be the means of fulfilling some of His promises.
Let us apply this view to the matter of prayer. All true prayer is
the fruit of the Holy Spirit working in the human soul. All the
prayer that God answers is prayer that God has inspired. The prayer
of Samuel was prayer which God had inspired. What more reasonable
than that in the great plan of providence there should have been
included a provision for the fulfillment of Samuel's prayer at the
appropriate moment? The thunderstorm, we may be sure, was a natural
phenomenon. But its occurrence at the time was part of that great
scheme of Providence which God planned at the beginning, and it was
planned to fall out then in order that it might serve as an answer
to Samuel's prayer. It was thus an answer to prayer brought about by
natural causes. The only thing miraculous about it was its forming a
part of that most marvelous scheme - the scheme of Divine providence
- a part of the scheme that was to be carried into effect after
Samuel had prayed. If the term supernatural may be fitly applied to
that scheme which is the sum and substance of all the laws of
nature, of all the providence of God, and of all the works and
thoughts of man, then it was a miracle; but if not, it was a natural
effect.
It is important to bear these truths in mind, because many have the
impression that prayer for outward results cannot be answered
without a miracle, and that it is unreasonable to suppose that such
a multitude of miracles as prayer involves would be wrought every
day. If a sick man prays for health, is the answer necessarily a
miracle? No; for the answer may come about by purely natural causes.
He has been directed to a skilful physician; he has used the right
medicine; he has been treated in the way to give full scope to the
recuperative power of nature. God, who led him to pray, foresaw the
prayer, and in the original scheme of Providence planned that by
natural causes the answer should come. We do not deny that prayer
may be answered in a supernatural way. We would not affirm that such
a thing as supernatural healing is unknown. But it is most useful
that the idea should be entertained that such prayer is usually
answered by natural means. By not attending to this men often fail
to perceive that prayer has been answered. You pray, before you set
out on a journey, for protection and safe arrival at the end. You
get what you asked - you perform the journey in safety. But perhaps
you say, "It would have been all the same whether I had prayed for
it or not. I have gone on journeys that I forgot to pray about, and
no evil befell me. Some of my fellow-passengers, I am sure, did not
pray for safety, yet they were taken care of as much as I was." But
these are sophistical arguments. You should feel that your safety in
the journey about which you prayed was as much due to God, though
only through the operation of natural causes, as if you had had a
hairbreadth escape. You should be thankful that in cases where you
did not pray for safety God had regard to the habitual set of your
mind, your habitual trust in Him, though you did not specially
exercise it at these times. Let the means be as natural as they may
- to those who have eyes to see the finger of God is in them all the
same.
But to return to the Israelites and the Philistines. The defeat of
the Philistines was a very thorough one. Not only did they make no
attempt to rally after the storm had passed and Israel had fallen on
them, but they came no more into the coast of Israel, and the hand
of the Lord was against them all the days of Samuel. And besides
this, all the cities and tracts of land belonging to Israel which
the Philistines had taken were now restored. Another mercy that came
to Israel was that "there was peace between Israel and the
Amorites"- the Amorites being put here, most likely, for the remains
of all the original inhabitants living among or around Israel. Those
promises were now fulfilled in which God had said to Moses, "This
day will I begin to put the dread of thee and the fear of thee upon
the nations that are under the whole heaven, who shall hear report
of thee, and shall tremble and be in anguish because of thee" (Deu
2:25). "There shall no man be able to stand before you; for the Lord
your God shall lay the fear of you and the dread of you upon all the
land ye shall tread upon, as He hath said to thee." It was so
apparent that God was among them, and that the power of God was
irresistible and overwhelming, that their enemies were frightened to
assail them.
The impression thus made on the enemies of Israel corresponds in
some degree to the moral influence which God-fearing men sometimes
have on an otherwise godless community. The picture in the Song of
Solomon - "Who is she that looketh forth as the morning, fair as the
moon, clear as the sun, and terrible as an army with banners?" -
ascribes even to the fair young bride a terrifying power, a power
not appropriate to such a picture in the literal sense, but quite
suitable in the figurative. Wherever the life and character of a
godly man is such as to recall God, wherever God's image is plainly
visible, wherever the results of God's presence are plainly seen,
there the idea of a supernatural Power is conveyed, and a certain
overawing influence is felt. In the great awakening at Northampton
in Jonathan Edwards' days, there was a complete arrest laid on open
forms of vice. And whensoever in a community God's presence has been
powerfully realized, the taverns have been emptied, the
gambling-table deserted, under the sense of His august majesty.
Would only that the character and life of all God's servants were so
truly godlike that their very presence in a community would have a
subduing and restraining influence on the wicked!
Two points yet remain to be noticed: the step taken by Samuel to
commemorate this wonderful Divine interposition; and the account
given of the prophet and his occupations in his capacity of Judge of
Israel.
''Samuel took a stone, and set it between Mizpeh and Shen, and
called the name of it Ebenezer, saying, Hitherto hath the Lord
helped us."
The position of Shen is not known. But it must have been very near
the scene of the defeat of the Philistines - perhaps it was the very
spot where that defeat occurred. In that case, Samuel's stone would
stand midway between the two scenes of battle: the battle gained by
him on his knees at Mizpeh, and the battle gained by the Israelites
when they fell on the Philistines demoralized by the thunderstorm.
"Hitherto hath the Lord helped us." The characteristic feature of
the inscription lies in the word "hitherto." It was no doubt a
testimony to special help obtained in that time of trouble; it was a
grateful recognition of that help; and it was an enduring monument
to perpetuate the memory of it. But it was more, much more. The word
''hitherto "denotes a series, a chain of similar mercies, an
unbroken succession of Divine interpositions and Divine
deliverances. The special purpose of this inscription was to link on
the present deliverance to all the past, and to form a testimony to
the enduring faithfulness and mercy of a covenant-keeping God. But
was there not something strange in this inscription, considering the
circumstances? Could Samuel have forgot that tragic day at Shiloh -
the bewildered, terrified look of the messenger that came from the
army to bring the news, the consternation caused by his message, the
ghastly horror of Eli and his tragic death, the touching death of
the wife of Phinehas, and the sad name which she had with such
seeming propriety given to her babe? Was that like God remembering
them? or had Samuel forgot how the victorious Philistines soon after
dashed upon Shiloh like beasts of prey, plundering, destroying,
massacring, till nothing more remained to be done to justify the
name of "Ichabod"? How can Samuel blot that chapter out of the
history? or how can he say, with that chapter fresh in his
recollection, "Hitherto hath the Lord helped us"?
All that Samuel has considered well. Even amid the desolations of
Shiloh the Lord was helping them. He was helping them to know
themselves, helping them to know their sins, and helping them to
know the bitter fruit and woeful punishment of sin. He was helping
them to achieve the great end for which he had called them - to keep
alive the knowledge of the true God and the practice of His worship,
onward to the time when the great promise should be realized, - when
He should come in whom all the families of the earth were to be
blessed. Samuel's idea of what constituted the nation's glory was
large and spiritual. The true glory of the nation was to fulfill the
function for which God had taken it into covenant with Himself.
Whatever helped them to do this was a blessing, was a token of the
Lord's remembrance of them. The links of the long chain denoted by
Samuel's "hitherto" were not all of one kind. Some were in the form
of mercies, many were in the form of chastenings. For the higher the
function for which Israel was called, the more need was there of
chastening. The higher the destination of a silver vessel, the
greater is the need that the silver be pure, and therefore that it
be frequently passed through the furnace. The destination of Israel
was the highest that could have been. So Samuel does not merely give
thanks for seasons of prosperity, but for checks and chastenings
too.
Happy they who, full of faith in the faithfulness and love of God,
can take a similar view of His dealings! Happy they who, when
special mercies come, deem the occasion worthy to be commemorated by
some special memorial, but who can embrace their whole life in the
grateful commemoration, and bracket joys and sorrows alike under
their "hitherto"! It is not that sorrows are less sorrows to them
than to others; it is not that losses of substance entail less
inconvenience, or bereavements penetrate less deeply; but that all
are seen to be embraced in that gracious plan of which the final
consummation is, as the apostle puts it, "to present her to Himself
a glorious Church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing."
And well is it for us, both in individual life and in Church and
national life, to think of that plan of God in which mercies and
chastenings are united, but all with a gracious purpose! It is
remarkable how often in Scripture tears are wiped away with this
thought. Zion saying, "The Lord hath forsaken me, and my God hath
forgotten me," is assured, "Behold, I have graven thee upon the
palms of My hands, thy walls are continually before Me." Rachel
weeping for her children, and refusing to be comforted, is thus
addressed, "Refrain thy voice from weeping and thine eyes from
tears; for thy work shall be rewarded, saith the Lord, and thy
children shall come again from the land of the enemy." "Weep not,"
said our Lord to the woman of Nain; and His first words after His
resurrection were, "Woman, why weepest thou?" Vale of tears though
this world is, there comes from above a gracious influence to wipe
them away; and the march Zionward has in it some- thing of the tread
and air of a triumphant procession, for "the ransomed of the Lord
shall return and come to Zion with songs and everlasting joy on
their heads; they shall obtain joy and gladness, and sorrow and
sighing shall flee away."
We have yet to notice the concluding verses of the chapter (1Sa
7:15-17), which give a little picture of the public life of Samuel.
He judged Israel all the days of his life. The office of judge had a
twofold sphere, external and internal. Externally, it bore on the
oppression of the people by foreign enemies, and the judge became
the deliverer of the people. But in this sense there was now nothing
for Samuel to do, especially after the accession of Saul to the
kingdom. The judge seems to have likewise had to do with the
administration of justice, and the preservation of the peace and
general welfare of the nation. It is very natural to suppose that
Samuel would be profoundly concerned to imbue the people with just
views of the purpose for which God had called them, and of the law
and covenant which He had given them. The three places among which
he is said to have made his circuit. Bethel, Gilgal and Mizpeh, were
not far from each other, all being situated in the tribes of
Benjamin and Judah, - in that part of the land which afterwards
constituted the kingdom of the two tribes. To these three places
falls to be added Ramah, also in the same neighbourhood, where was
his house. In this place he built an altar to the Lord.
Whether this was in connection with the tabernacle or not, we cannot
say. We know that in the time of David's wanderings "the house of
God" was at Nob (Compare 1Sa 21:1 and Mat 12:4), but we have nothing
to show us when it was carried thither. All we can say is, that
Samuel's altar must have been a visible memorial of the worship of
God, and a solemn protest against any idolatrous rites to which any
of the people might at any time be attracted.
In this way Samuel spent his life like Him whose type he was,
"always about his Father's business." An unselfish man, having no
interests of his own, full of zeal for the service of God and the
public welfare; possibly too little at home, taking too little
charge of his children, and thus at last in the painful position of
one, "whose sons walked not in his ways, but turned aside after
lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment" (1Sa 8:1). That
Samuel attained the highest reputation for sanctity, intercourse
with God and holy influence, is plain from various passages of
Scripture. In Psa 99:6, he is coupled with Moses and Aaron, as
having influence with God, - "they called upon the Lord and He
answered them." In Jer 15:1, his name is coupled with that of Moses
alone as a powerful intercessor, "Though Moses and Samuel stood
before Me, yet My mind could not be toward this people." His
mother's act of consecration was wonder-fully fulfilled. Samuel
stands out as one of the best and purest of the Hebrew worthies. His
name became a perpetual symbol of all that was upright, pure and
Godlike. The silent influence of his character was a great power in
Israel, inspiring many a young heart with holy awe, and silencing
the flippant arrogance of the scoffer. Mothers, did not Hannah do
well, do nobly, in dedicating her son to the Lord? Sons and
daughters, was it not a noble and honourable life? Then go ye and do
likewise. And God be pleased to incline many a heart to the service;
a service, which with all its drawbacks, is the highest and the
noblest; and which bequeaths so blessed a welcome into the next
stage of existence: "Well done, good and faithful servant; enter
thou into the joy of thy Lord."
|