ARTAXERXES I, a son of Xerxes I and Amestris, whose
name Flavius Josephus (Jewish Antiquities 11.6.1.)
gives as Cyrus, Persian king 465-64 to 424-23 B.C.
Greek authors (first Plutarch, Artoxerxes 1.1) give
him the surname “Longhanded, Long-armed”
(Makrocheir, Latin Macrochir, Longimanus, New
Persian ArdaŜ^r-e dera@zdast). They explain the term
symbolically (cf. Pollux, Onomastikon 2.151) as
“with far-reaching power” or in a rationalized
manner, because his right arm was longer than the
left one (Plutarch, loc. cit.). In 465-64, in the
course of a court revolution, the details of which
are not clear (Ctesias F 13f. in Jacoby, Fragmente;
Aristoteles, Politica 5.10.1311 b37; Diodorus
11.69.1-6; Justin 3.1.2-9), Xerxes was murdered by
court officials, including the chief of his
life-guards Artapanus. They accused Darius, Xerxes'
oldest son, of being the murderer. After having put
aside his brother, the still young Artaxerxes
(Justin 3.1.3) ascended the throne and killed
Artapanus (who had made an attempt on the new king's
life) and the other murderers (Diodorus 11.71.1); he
was aided by the general Megabyzus, his
brother-in-law. The exact month-dates of all these
events are not given. Artaxerxes' accession year is
generally thought to be the year 284 of the
Babylonian Nobonassar era (beginning in December,
465 B.C.), that is, the 4th year of Olympiad 78.
This revolution and the fall of Artapanus caused
further rebellions. One in Bactria was led either by
the satrap Artabanus (Ctesias F 14) or more
plausibly, by another brother of the king, Hystaspes
(Diodorus 11.69.2), who also asserted a claim to the
throne. In Egypt the Libyan king Inarus (Ctesias,
loc. cit.; Thucydides 1.104.1) also headed a revolt.
Since Inarus asked the Athenians for help, the
Egyptian revolt of the following years resulted in
another confrontation of the Persians and the
Greeks. With the utmost exertion of military forces,
as well as diplomacy, Artaxerxes succeeded in
subjugating and reconquering Egypt, but only in
455-54. First Inarus overthrew the Persians under
the king's uncle (according to Ctesias, his brother)
Achaemenes, who was the satrap of Egypt, and then an
Athenian fleet under Cimon won a great triumph over
the Persian ships on the Egyptian coast. Having
looked in vain for an alliance with Sparta
(Thucydides 1.109.2f.), Artaxerxes sent a relieving
force commanded by Megabyzus, who set free the
Persians enclosed in the so-called White Wall at
Memphis for more than a year. Megabyzus defeated
Inarus and the Athenians, besieged them at Byblus in
the Nile delta, and forced them to surrender on safe
retreat in the beginning of 455-54 (Herodotus
3.12.4, 160.2; 7.7; Thucydides 1.104, 109-10;
Ctesias F 14; Isocrates 8.86; Diodorus 11.71.3-6,
74-75, 77.1-5). An Arsames was then appointed as the
new satrap of this province, which now remained
definitely under Persian control. He probably is the
same person who is attested as the sender and
addressee on a series of Aramaic papyri. Shortly
after Callias' peace (see below), Megabyzus rebelled
in Syria against Artaxerxes. According to Ctesias (F
14), this was caused by the execution of Inarus and
the captured Greeks by the king, contrary to the
agreement the general had made with them. Two armies
under Usiris and Menostates were defeated by
Megabyzus. Finally a settlement was arranged by
Amestris and by Amytis (the king's sister and the
wife of Megabyzus); a quarrel and reconciliation
between the two men took place a second time some
years later (Ctesias, ibid.).
Soon after his accession, Artaxerxes gave refuge to
the fugitive Themistocles, thus pardoning his
father's greatest antagonist. After some time
Themistocles went back to Asia Minor, where he
governed Magnesia, Lampsacus, and Myus and protected
them against Greek attacks (Thucydides
1.137.3-138.5; Cornelius Nepos, Themistocles
9.1-10.3). Artaxerxes' mildness and highmindedness
are praised by Plutarch (Artoxerxes 1.1); he was a
capable, resolute, and skillful monarch (especially
in foreign affairs). In spite of his youth, he
showed statesmanship and seemed qualified to renew
Persia's world power status. He is termed a strong
and brave warrior (Cornelius Nepos, De Regibus 1.4)
passionately interested in hunting (Ctesias F 14).
But in internal affairs of the court and the family,
other persons, notably Amestris and Amytis (see
above), influenced the king, so that he has also
been called a weakling commanded by the harem.
In 450 B.C. a large Athenian fleet made a new attack
on Cyprus. It gained a victory but lost its leader
Cimon, who died in Citium (Plutarch, Cimon
18.1-19.4). Artaxerxes sent as envoys to Athens his
successful generals of the Egyptian campaign,
Artabazus and Megabyzus. In reply an Athenian
delegation led by Callias came to Susa; in the
winter of 449-48 the so-called peace of Callias (or
Cimon) was negotiated (Herodotus 7.151; Thucydides
1.112.2-4; Diodorus 12.2.3-4.6, 26.2; Cornelius
Nepos, Cimon 3.4; Plutarch, Cimon 13.4-6). The basis
for settlement was the status quo ante, whereby
Persians and Athenians delimited their respective
spheres of rule. Athens gave up Egypt, Cyprus, and
the Ionian cities on the Anatolian coast (these
being now autonomous), while the Persians promised
not to advance an army beyond the Halys river or to
send their larger ships beyond Phaselis in Pamphylia
or beyond the “dark rocks” at the entrance to the
Euxine Sea. Callias regarded this treaty, contrary
to common Athenian opinion, as a diplomatic victory.
While it manifests the results of Persian diplomacy
and Greek corruptibility, it also indicates the
decline of the Persian empire. In 440-39 Athens
broke the treaty by attacking Samos, then at war
with Miletus. Pericles had already sent Athenian
reinforcements to the latter state (under democratic
government), while the satrap of Lydia, Pissuthnes,
had responded by aiding the oligarchic Samos
(Thucydides 1.115.4, 116.3; Diodorus 12.27.1-28.4;
Plutarch, Pericles 25.2-26.4). When the
Peloponnesian war broke out in 431, first Sparta
(Thucydides 2.67.1-3, 4.50.1-2) and then Athens
tried to enter into relations with the Persian Great
King; but no treaty had been achieved when
Artaxerxes died in the prime of life in 424-23
(Thucydides 4.50.3; Diodorus 12.64.1; his last date
is attested in this year, day 29, month 11, regnal
year 41, in a Babylonian document, BM 33342; see M.
W. Stolper, AMI 16, 1983 [1985], pp. 223-36). The
generally accepted date of his death in 425-24 seems
based on the Babylonian Nabonassar era; but the
sources show some confusion about the length of his
reign: Ctesias, for instance, gives 42 years,
Diodorus 40. The chronology is complicated by the
brief and officially unrecognized reigns of
Artapanus before, and of Xerxes II and Sogdianus
after his own.
Under Artaxerxes I the situation of the Jews in
Israel considerably improved. The king appointed the
orthodox scribe Ezra as a sort of court official for
Jewish affairs. In the seventh regnal year Ezra
proceeded to Jerusalem with about 1,500 Jewish
families of the exile community (Ezra 7:7ff.). They
included many priests, Levites, and temple slaves
and brought sacrificial utensils and abundant money.
Ezra was authorized to be their leader by Artaxerxes
and commanded to regulate the Jews' life according
to the Mosaic Law (edict in Ezra 7:11-26). The king
thus conceded a measure of autonomy. In year 20 the
king sent his cupbearer Nehemiah (one of several
high officials who were Jews) to rebuild the walls
of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 1:1, 2:1). He was governor of
Judea for 12 years (ibid., 5:14) and then returned
to Susa. The restoration of the Temple, previously
ordered by Cyrus the Great, so progressed in this
reign that it was completed in year six of Darius II
(Ezra 6:15).
Artaxerxes' queen was Damaspia (Ctesias F 15), who
bore his legal heir and successor, Xerxes. The king
had 17 other sons by his concubines, who included
the Babylonians Alogune, mother of
Secudianus/Sogdianus, q.v.); Cosmartidene, mother of
Arsites; and Andria [not Andia], mother of Bagapaeus
and princess Parysatis. Parysatis married her half
brother Darius II Nothus, who was another son of a
Babylonian concubine (possibly Cosmartidene, but
Ctesias is not clear).
Artaxerxes' own building activity included the
completion of the throne hall (the “Hall of 100
columns”) in Persepolis—a project begun by his
father. His Akkadian and Old Persian inscription
(A1Pa in Kent, Old Persian, New Haven, 1953, p. 153;
see also F. H. Weissbach, Die Keilinschriften der
Achämeniden, Leipzig, 1911, p. 121 ), found on a
marble block, records this fact. (Cf. the similar
text in Akkadian edited in E. Herzfeld, Altpersische
Inschriften. Berlin, 1938, pp. 45f., no. 22 [to be
labeled A1Pb]. A minor inscription in Old Persian,
A1I, is found on several silver dishes; see Kent, p.
153.) At Susa the palace (apada@na) of Darius burnt
down during Artaxerxes' reign, who then erected a
much smaller one in the southern part of the city.
Artaxerxes himself is probably depicted at
Persepolis, where audience reliefs occur on the
northern doorway of the throne hall (E. F. Schmidt,
Persepolis I, Chicago, 1953, pls. 98-99); the king
is depicted on a throne, which is borne by
representatives of the nations of the empire.
A notable source for economic information during
this and the following reign is found in the tablets
of the business house of MuraŜu@ and Sons (possibly
a Jewish family) at Nippur (see G. Cardascia, Les
archives des MuraŜû, Paris, 1951). It has been
suggested that under Artaxerxes, about 441 B.C., a
new and distinctly Zoroastrian calendar, copying the
Egyptian one, was promulgated in the empire (S. H.
Taqizadeh, Old Iranian Calendars, London, 1938, and
BSOAS 14, 1952, pp. 603-11).
Bibliography : See also, for Artaxerxes' coinage,
E. Babelon, Catalogue des monnaies grecques de la
Bibliotheàque Nationale [II:] Les perses
ache‚m‚nides. . . , Paris, 1893, pls. I.22-27.
British Museum Catalogue. Arabia, Mesopotamia and
Persia, London, 1922, pls. XXIV.24-28. Fragments of
the Greek historians are cited according to F.
Jacoby, Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker,
Berlin, 1923-58.
(R. Schmitt)
|