THE PROPHET AS SCEPTIC
Habakkuk 1- Hab 2:4
OF the prophet Habakkuk we know nothing that is
personal save his name - to our ears his somewhat odd name. It is
the intensive form of a root which means to caress or embrace. More
probably it was given to him as a child, than afterwards assumed as
a symbol of his clinging to God.
Tradition says that Habakkuk was a priest, the son of Joshua, of the
tribe of Levi, but this is only an inference from the late
liturgical notes to the Psalm which has been appended to his
prophecy. All that we know for certain is that he was a contemporary
of Jeremiah, with a sensitiveness under wrong and impulses to
question God which remind us of Jeremiah; but with a literary power
which is quite his own. We may emphasize the latter, even though we
recognize upon his writing the influence of Isaiah’s.
Habakkuk’s originality, however, is deeper than style. He is the
earliest who is known to us of a new school of religion in Israel.
He is called "prophet," but at first he does not adopt the attitude
which is characteristic of the prophets. His face is set in an
opposite direction to theirs. They address the nation Israel, on
behalf of God: he rather speaks to God on behalf of Israel. Their
task was Israel’s sin, the proclamation of God’s doom, and the offer
of His grace to their penitence. Habakkuk’s task is God Himself, the
effort to find out what He means by permitting tyranny and wrong.
They attack the sins; he is the first to state the problems, of
life. To him the prophetic revelation, the Torah, is complete: it
has been codified in Deuteronomy and enforced by Josiah. Habakkuk’s
business is not to add to it, but to ask why it does not work. Why
does God suffer wrong to triumph, so that the Torah is paralyzed,
and Mishpat, the prophetic "justice" or "judgment," comes to naught?
The prophets travailed for Israel’s character-to get the people to
love justice till justice prevailed among them: Habakkuk feels
justice cannot prevail in Israel, because of the great disorder
which God permits to fill the world. It is true that he arrives at a
prophetic attitude, and before the end authoritatively declares
God’s will; but he begins by searching for the latter, with an
appreciation of the great obscurity cast over it by the facts of
life. He complains to God, asks questions, and expostulates. This is
the beginning of speculation in Israel. It does not go far: it is
satisfied with stating questions to God; it does not, directly at
least, state questions against Him. But Habakkuk at least feels that
revelation is baffled by experience, that the facts of life bewilder
a man who believes in the God whom the prophets have declared to
Israel. As in Zephaniah prophecy begins to exhibit traces of
apocalypse, so in Habakkuk we find it developing the first impulses
of speculation.
We have seen that the course of events which troubles Habakkuk and
renders the Torah ineffectual is somewhat obscure. On one
interpretation of these two chapters, that which takes the present
order of their verses as the original, Habakkuk asks why God is
silent in face of the injustice which fills the whole horizon, {Hab
1:1-4} is told to look round among the heathen and see how God is
raising up the Chaldeans, {Hab 1:5-11} presumably to punish this
injustice (if it be Israel’s own) or to overthrow it (if Hab 1:1-4
mean that it is inflicted on Israel by a foreign power). But the
Chaldeans only aggravate the prophet’s problem; they themselves are
a wicked and oppressive people: how can God suffer them? {Hab
1:12-17} Then come the prophet’s waiting for an answer {Hab 2:1} and
the answer itself. {Hab 2:2 ff.} Another interpretation takes the
passage about the Chaldeans {Hab 1:5-11} to be out of place where it
now lies, removes it to after chapter 4 as a part of God’s answer to
the prophet’s problem, and leaves the remainder of chapter1 as the
description of the Assyrian oppression of Israel, baffling the Torah
and perplexing the prophet’s faith in a Holy and Just God. Of these
two views the former is, we have seen, somewhat artificial, and
though the latter is by no means proved, the arguments for it are
sufficient to justify us in re-arranging the verses of chapter 1-2:4
in accordance with its proposals.
"The Oracle which Habakkuk the Prophet Received by Vision. How long,
O Jehovah, have I called and Thou hearest not? I cry to Thee. Wrong!
and Thou sendest no help. Why make me look upon sorrow, And fill
mine eyes with trouble? Violence and wrong are before me, Strife
comes and quarrel arises. So the Law is benumbed, and judgment never
gets forth: For the wicked beleaguers the righteous, So judgment
comes forth perverted."
"Art not, Thou of old, Jehovah, my God, my Holy One? Purer of eyes
than to behold evil, And that canst not gaze upon trouble! Why
gazest Thou upon traitors, Art dumb when the wicked swallows him
that is more righteous than he? Thou hast let men be made like fish
of the sea, Like worms that have no ruler! He lifts the whole of it
with his angle: Draws it in with his net, sweeps it in his drag-net:
So rejoices and exults. So he sacrifices to his net, and offers
incense to his drag-net; For by them is his portion fat, and his
food rich. Shall he forever draw his sword, And ceaselessly,
ruthlessly massacre nations?"
"Upon my watch-tower I will stand, And take my post on the rampart.
I will watch to see what He will say to me, And what answer I get
back to my plea".
"And Jehovah answered me and said: Write the vision, and make it
plain upon tablets, That he may run who reads it".
"For the vision is for a time yet to be fixed, Yet it hurries to the
end, and shall not fail: Though it linger, wait thou for it; Coming
it shall come, and shall not be behind. Lo! swollen, not level is
his soul within him; But the righteous shall live by his
faithfulness. {Hab 1:5-11} round among the heathen, and look well,
Shudder and be shocked; For I am about to do a work in your days, Ye
shall not believe it when told. For, lo, I am about to raise up the
Kasdim, A people the most bitter and the most hasty, That traverse
the breadths of the earth, To possess dwelling-places not their own.
Awful and terrible are they; From themselves start their purpose and
rising".
"Fleeter than leopards their steeds, Swifter than night-wolves.
Their horsemen leap from afar; They swoop like the eagle a-haste to
devour. All for wrong do they come: The set of their faces is
forward, And they sweep up captives like sand. They-at kings do they
scoff, And princes are sport to them. They-they laugh at each
fortress, Heap dust up and take it! Then the wind shifts and they
pass! But doomed are those whose own strength is their god!"
The difficulty of deciding between the various arrangements of the
two chapters of Habakkuk does not, fortunately, prevent us from
appreciating his argument. What he feels throughout (this is
obvious, however you arrange his verses) is the tyranny of a great
heathen power, be it Assyrian, Egyptian, or Chaldean. The prophet’s
horizon is filled with Hab 1:3; Israel thrown into disorder,
revelation paralyzed, justice perverted. {Hab 1:4} But, like Nahum,
Habakkuk feels not for Israel alone. The tyrant has outraged
humanity. {Hab 1:13-17} He "sweeps peoples into his net," and as
soon as he empties this, he fills it again "ceaselessly," as if
there were no just God above. He exults in his vast cruelty, and has
success so unbroken that he worships the very means of it. In itself
such impiety is gross enough, but to a heart that believes in God it
is a problem of exquisite pain. Habakkuk’s is the burden of the
finest faith. He illustrates the great commonplace of religions
doubt, that problems arise and become rigorous in proportion to the
purity and tenderness of man’s conception of God. It is not the
coarsest but the finest temperaments which are exposed to
skepticism. Every advance in assurance of God or in appreciation of
His character develops new perplexities in face of the facts of
experience, and faith becomes her own most cruel troubler.
Habakkuk’s questions are not due to any cooling of the religious
temper in Israel, but are begotten of the very heat and ardor of
prophecy in its encounter with experience. His tremulousness, for
instance, is impossible without the high knowledge of God’s purity
and faithfulness, which older prophets had achieved in Israel:-
"Art not Thou of old, O Lord, my God, my Holy One, Purer of eyes
than to behold evil, And incapable of looking upon wrong?"
His despair is that which comes only from eager and persevering
habits of prayer:-
"How long, O Lord, have I called and Thou hearest not! I cry to Thee
of wrong and Thou givest no help!"
His questions, too, are bold with that sense of God’s absolute
power, which flashed so bright in. Israel as to blind men’s eyes to
all secondary and intermediate causes. "Thou," he says, -
"Thou hast made men like fishes of the sea, Like worms that have no
ruler,"
boldly charging the Almighty in almost the temper of Job himself,
with being the cause of the cruelty inflicted by the unchecked
tyrant upon the nations; "for shall evil happen, and Jehovah not
have done it?" Thus all through we perceive that Habakkuk’s trouble
springs from the central founts of prophecy. This skepticism-if we
may venture to give the name to the first motions in Israel’s mind
of that temper which undoubtedly became skepticism-this skepticism
was the inevitable heritage of prophecy: the stress and pain to
which prophecy was forced by its own strong convictions in face of
the facts of experience. Habakkuk, "the prophet," as he is called,
stood in the direct line of his order, but just because of that he
was the father also of Israel’s religious doubt.
But a discontent springing from sources so pure was surely the
preparation of its own healing. In a verse of exquisite beauty the
prophet describes the temper in which he trusted for an answer to
all his doubts:-
"On my watch-tower will I stand, And take up my post on the rampart;
I will watch to see what He says to me, And what answer I get back
to my plea."
This verse is not to be passed over, as if its metaphors were merely
for literary effect. They express rather the moral temper in which
the prophet carries his doubt, or, to use New Testament language,
"the good conscience, which some having put away, concerning faith
have made shipwreck." Nor is this temper patience only and a certain
elevation of mind, nor only a fixed attention and sincere
willingness to be answered. Through the chosen words there breathes
a noble sense of responsibility. The prophet feels he has a post to
hold, a rampart to guard. He knows the heritage of truth, won by the
great minds of the past; and in a world seething with disorder, he
will take his stand upon that and see what more his God will send
him. At the very least, he will not indolently drift, but feel that
he has a standpoint, however narrow, and bravely hold it. Such has
ever been the attitude of the greatest skeptics-not only, let us
repeat, earnestness and sincerity, but the recognition of duty
towards the truth: the conviction that even the most tossed and
troubled minds have somewhere a pou~ stw~ appointed of God, and upon
it interests human and Divine to defend. Without such a conscience,
skepticism, however intellectually gifted, will avail nothing. Men
who drift never discover, never grasp aught. They are only dazzled
by shifting gleams of the truth, only fretted and broken by
experience.
Taking then his stand within the patient temper, but especially upon
the conscience of his great order, the prophet waits for his answer
and the healing of his trouble. The answer comes to him in the
promise of "a Vision," which, though it seem to linger, will not be
later than the time fixed by God. "A Vision" is something realized,
experienced-something that will be as actual and present to the
waiting prophet as the cruelty which now fills his sight. Obviously
some series of historical events is meant, by which, in the course
of trine, the unjust oppressor of the nations shall be overthrown
and the righteous vindicated. Upon the re-arrangement of the text
proposed by Budde, this series of events is the rise of the
Chaldeans, and it is an argument in favor of his proposal that the
promise of "a Vision" requires some such historical picture to
follow it as we find in the description of the Chaldeans- Hab
1:5-11. This, too, is explicitly introduced by terms of vision: "See
among the nations and look round Yea, behold I am about to raise up
the Kasdim." But before this vision is given, and for the uncertain
interval of waiting ere the facts come to pass, the Lord enforces
upon His watching servant the great moral principle that arrogance
and tyranny cannot, from the nature of them, last, and that if the
righteous be only patient he will survive them:-
"Lo, swollen, not level, is his soul within him; But the righteous
shall live by his faithfulness."
We have already seen that the text of the first line of this couplet
is uncertain. Yet the meaning is obvious, partly in the words
themselves, and partly by their implied contrast with the second
line. The soul of the wicked is a radically morbid thing: inflated,
swollen (unless we should read perverted, which more plainly means
the same thing), not level, not natural and normal. In the nature of
things it cannot endure. "But the righteous shall live by his
faithfulness." This word, wrongly translated faith by the Greek and
other versions, is concentrated by Paul in his repeated quotation
from the Greek {Rom 1:17, Gal 3:11} upon that single act of faith by
which the sinner secures forgiveness and justification. With
Habakkuk it is a wider term. ‘Emunah, from a verb meaning originally
to be firm, is used in the Old Testament in the physical sense of
steadfastness. So it is applied to the arms of Moses held up by
Aaron and Hur over the battle with Amalek: "they were steadiness
till the going down of the sun." {Exo 17:12} It is also used of the
faithful discharge of public office {2Ch 19:9} and of fidelity as
between man and Hos 2:22 (Heb.). It is also faithful testimony, {Pro
14:5} equity in judgment, {Isa 11:5} truth in speech, {Pro 12:17;
cf. Jer 9:2} and sincerity or honest dealing. {Pro 12:22} Of course
it has faith in God as its secret-the verb from which it is derived
is the regular Hebrew term to believe-but it is rather the temper
which faith produces of endurance, steadfastness, integrity. Let the
righteous, however baffled his faith be by experience, hold on in
loyalty to God and duty, and he shall live. Though St. Paul, as we
have said, used the Greek rendering of "faith" for the enforcement
of trust in God’s mercy through Jesus Christ as the secret of
forgiveness and life it is rather to Habakkuk’s wider intention of
patience and fidelity that the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews
returns in his fuller quotation of the verse: "For yet a little
while and He that shall come will come and will not tarry; now the
just shall live by faith, but if he draw back My soul shall have no
pleasure in." {Heb 10:37-38}
Such, then is the tenor of the passage. In face of experience that
baffles faith, the duty of Israel is patience in loyalty to God. In
this the nascent skepticism of Israel received its first great
commandment, and this it never forsook. Intellectual questions
arose, of which Habakkuk’s were but the faintest
foreboding-questions concerning not only the mission and destiny of
the nation, but the very foundation of justice and the character of
God Himself. Yet did no skeptic, however bold and however provoked,
forsake his faithfulness. Even Job, when most audaciously arraigning
the God of his experience, turned from Him to God as in his heart of
hearts he believed He must be, experience notwithstanding. Even the
Preacher, amid the aimless flux and drift which he finds in the
universe, holds to the conclusion of the whole matter in a command,
which better than any other defines the contents of the faithfulness
enforced by Habakkuk: "Fear God and keep His commandments, for this
is the whole of man." It has been the same with the great mass of
the race. Repeatedly disappointed of their hopes, and crushed for
ages beneath an intolerable tyranny, have they not exhibited the
same heroic temper with which their first great questioner was
endowed? Endurance, this above all others has been the quality of
Israel: "though He slay me, yet will I trust Him." And, therefore,
as Paul’s adaptation, "The just shall live by faith," has become the
motto of evangelical Christianity, so we may say that Habakkuk’s
original of it has been the motto and the fame of Judaism: "The
righteous shall live by His faithfulness."
|