Fortieth Study.—Judah and
Israel in Exile.
[The material of this "study"
is furnished by Professor
Beecher. It is
edited by Professor Harper.]
1. The Deportations to Babylon,
under Nebuchadnezzar. Review the
accounts of
these, from the 37th " study,"
with especial attention to dates
and numbers.
(1) 2 Kgs.
24:1; 2 Chron. 36:6,7; Dan.
1:1,2, Daniel and his
companions, B.
C. 605.
(2) Jer. 52:28, 3023 persons, B.
C. 598.
(3) 2 Chron. 36:10; 2 Kgs.
24:10-16, etc., 10,000 persons,
with 7000 and 1000 (either
included in, or
exclusive of the 10,000), B. C.
597.
(4) Jer. 52:29, 832 persons, B.
C. 587.
(5) 2 Kgs.
25:8-21; 2 Chron. 36:18-20; Jer.
39:8-10; 52:12-27, general
deportation, B. C. 586.
(6) Jer. 52:30, 745 persons, B.
C. 582.
(7) 2 Kgs.
25:26; Jer. 41:11-44:30,
voluntary exile of many Jews to
Egypt, B. C. 586.1
2. The Date and the Duration of
the Babylonian Exile.
(1) Over how many years
did the process of
Nebuchadnezzar's carrying Judah
into exile extend?2
(2) Jer.
25:11,12; 29:10; Dan. 9:2; 2
Chron. 36:21; Zech. 1:12; 7:5
(cf. Isa.
23:15,17), how about the seventy
years of the exile?
(a) is this to be
regarded as an exact number, or
a round number?
(b) can you fix the
beginning and end of the seventy
years, from biblical data?3
3. Previous Deportations from
Israel and Judah.
(1) From Israel:
(a) 1 Chron.
5:6,23,26 (cf. 2 Kgs. 15:19,20;
2 Chron. 30:6-10; Zech. 10:10,
11, by Pul or
Tiglath-pileser, in reign of
Menahem, of people from the
Hermon region,
Bashan, Gilead, and east of
Jordan;
(b) 2 Kgs. 15:29; 2 Chron.
30:6-10;
Jos. Ant. IX. xii. 3, by
Tiglath-pileser, in reign of
Pekah, from east and
west of the northern Jordan;
(c) 2 Kgs. 17, especially 17:6;
18:11, by Sargon, in the reign of Hoshea, of
the rest of the ten tribes;
(d) Schrader, or
other Assyriological writers on
these passages, Sargon says that
at one time
he carried away 27,280
inhabitants of Samaria, and
mentions, at several
dates, the deportation and
importation of inhabitants from
and to these
regions;
(e) Ezra 4:2,10, and Assyrian
records, possibly later
deportations
and importations.
(2) From Judah:
(a) 2 Chron. 29:9, possibly,
Judaean
exiles before Hezekiah's time;
(b) the records of Sennacherib,
who says
that, in Hezekiah's time, he
captured in Judaea 200,150
people, " small and
great, male and female;" cf.
"remnant," 2 Kgs. 19:30,31, and
similar
expressions in the biblical
history.
(3) Zech, 10:10,11; 2 Kgs.
23:34; Jer.
24:8; 22:11,12, etc. Exiles into
Egypt and other countries than
Assyria
and Babylonia.
4. The Relations of the Exiles
of Nebuchadnezzar's Time to the
Earlier Exiles. It
is often both assumed and
asserted that the earlier
exiles, especially those
from the northern tribes, either
lost their identity among the
nations
whither they were carried, or
else became lost to history. On
the latter
supposition, the problem of the
finding of the lost ten tribes
is often brought
up for solution. In opposition
to all such views, weigh the
following reasons for holding that the
earlier exiles, both from Israel
and Judah, became
mingled with the exiles of
Nebuchadnezzar's time,
constituting the Jewish
people, as it has ever since
existed:
(1) The known character of the
Israelitish race for race-persistence.
(2) The geographical statements
as to where
the exiles were located:
(a) 1 Chron. 5:26; 2 Kgs. 15:29;
17:6; 18:11, locate
on a map the territories
assigned to the exiles of the
ten tribes;4
(b) the
references in 1 above, with Jer.
24:5; 28:4,6; 50:8;
51:6, etc., locate the
destination of
Nebuchadnezzar's exiles;5
(c) Jer. 29:14,7; 3:18; Ezek.
1:2,
etc., with many of the passages
cited below, Jeremiah and
Ezekiel speak of
the exiles of Nebuchadnezzar's
time as not confined to
Babylonia, but living
in all the countries, and
especially in the " north,"
whither the ten tribes had
formerly been carried;
(d) Ezra 1:1,3,4, etc.; Esth.
2:5,6; 3:8; 8:8-17, etc., from
fifty to a hundred years later,
these exiles of Nebuchadnezzar's
time were
found in all parts of the
Persian empire.
(3)
(a) Jer. 3:12,18; 31:4,5,6,8,9,
and
very many passages, Jeremiah
testifies that Israel of the ten
tribes was
living in the north, scattered
among- all the nations, in his
time;
(b) the
same passages and Jer. 31:18,20;
50:19, etc., it is promised that
Israel, as
distinguished from Judah, shall
be restored from the north
country and all
the nations, to Palestine;
(c) Jer. 3:18; 30:3; 31
throughout; 50:20; 51:5;
Ezek. 37:16-22; Zech. 8:13, and
very many places, it is
represented that
Judah and Israel are dwelling
together in the north country,
and among the
nations, and will return
together, the differences
between them being
effaced.
(4) The different tribes are
represented as still in
existence, during
and after the Babylonian exile:
(a) Ezek. 48 and Rev. 7,
apocalyptically,
all the tribes by name;
(b) Ezek. 37:19; 45:8;
47:13,21,22,23; Matt. 19:28;
Luke 22:30; Acts 26:7; Jas. 1:1;
Rev. 21:12, etc., the twelve
tribes in
general;
(c) Rev. 5:5; Ezra 1:5; Rom.
11:1; Luke 2:36; Acts 4:36,
etc.,
Judah, Benjamin, Levi, and
Asher.
(5) In Ezra and Nehemiah, and
especially in Esther, the
numbers of the Jews are too
great to be reasonably
accounted for on the supposition
that they were all descended
from the
exiles taken away by
Nebuchadnezzar; it is the
testimony of these books
that the Jews who returned to
Palestine were only a small part
of the Jewish population of the Persian
empire, and this is confirmed by
all subsequent
history.
5. Conditions of Life among the
Exiles.
(1) 2 Kgs. 25:27, cf. such
passages as Isa.
49:9; 61:1, some cases of
imprisonment and ill-treatment.
(2) Jer. 29:4-7,
cf. Ezra 1, and Ezekiel and
Esther throughout, the ordinary
life of the
exile.
(3) Jer. 29:1; Ezek. 8:1; 14:1;
20:1; Ezra 3:2; 2:68,70, etc.,
they
retained, mainly, the
organization to which they had
been accustomed, with
elders, prophets, priests,
"heads of fathers' houses," and
the Judean high
priest, royal family, and temple
attendants kept distinct.
(4) Jer. 29:8,15,
21-32; Ezek. 13, etc., false
prophets among the exiles.
6. Some Special Institutions of
the Exile.
(1) Zech. 7:2,3,5; 8:19, fasts;
learn
what you can concerning them.
(2) Ezra 8:15-20, the place
Casiphia; learn
what you can in Ezra and
Nehemiah about the temple
singers, porters, etc.
7. Two Classes of Exiles.
(1) Dan. 1:19-21; 2:46-49; 3:30;
5:11,12,29; 6:1-3;
2 Kgs. 25:28, etc., the
character of these exiles, and
their standing among
the Babylonians.
(2) Jer. 29, Ezek. 13, and all
Ezekiel, the character of
these exiles, and their standing
in the countries where they
lived.
(3) Is
the representation in Daniel
contradictory to that in Ezekiel
and Jeremiah?
(4) If
both these representations are
true, what were probably the
relations
of these two classes of exiles,
and the nature of the influence
of each class
on the other?
8. The Feelings of the Exiles
toward Babylon.
(1) Read Ps. 137, and look up,
with
concordance, the passages that
mention Babylon, in Jeremiah,
Ezekiel, and
the post-exilic books.
(2) Did this feeling prevent
their being faithful citizens of the Babylonian empire?
9. Scripture Study during the
Exile. Dan. 10:21; 9:2; Zech.
1:4-6; Ezra 7:6, and
other passages in which Ezra is
called a scribe; Neh. 8:1-3,
what do passages like these indicate as to
the study and use of the Old
Testament books
by the exiled Jews?
10. The Worship of Idols. Jer.
44 and Ezek. 8, for example,
contain rebukes sent
to the Jews during the earlier
part of the seventy years of
exile; compare
these with such rebukes as you
can find in Ezra, Nehemiah,
Haggai, Zech.
1-8, Malachi. Can you draw any
inferences in regard to the
effect of the
exile on Jewish idol worship?
11. What Followed the Exile.
(1) Did most of the Israelites
return to Palestine,
in the times of Zerubabel and
Ezra?
(2) Where were the Jews living
in
the times of Jesus and the
Apostles?
(3) How has it been ever since?
(4) Was
the influence of Israel in human
history, on the whole, weakened
by the exile? or was it
enlarged?
|
1) The whole
number thus carried into exile
may have been from 20,000 to
40,000. If we hold
that these were mostly men, the
adding of the number of the
women and children will largely
increase the total.
2) The
importance of this question
arises from the fact that we
find in books so many statements based on the assumption
that the exile is to be dated in
some one year. Many of the
results reached from this
assumption are peculiar. It is
essential to fix in mind that
the carrying of Judah into exile was a
series of events extending over
at least twenty-four years, and
not a single event; and so to
fix this in mind that you will
instantly detect mistakes
arising from
the opposite assumption.
3) Each of the
following periods is exactly
seventy years: (1) Death of
Josiah, B. C. 608, to
first year of Cyrus, B. C. 538,
counting but one of the terminal
years. (2) Exile of Daniel, 605
B.
C., to 536 B. C., counting both
terminal years. It is possible
to count 536 B. C. as the first
year of
Cyrus, by counting the two
previous years to Darius the
Mede. Apparently, the Book of
Daniel
has two different ways of
counting the first year of
Cyrus, Dan. 1:21; 10:1. (3)
Burning of the
first temple, B. C. 586, to the
completing of Zerubabel's
temple, B. C. 516, counting one
terminal
year.
4) You will
find this somewhat in dispute,
but will have no difficulty in
placing them somewhere in northern Mesopotamia,
or eastward from there, across
the Tigris, or, perhaps, in both
regions, and, at all events, far
to the north or north-east of
the country properly called
Babylonia.
5) In a great
number of places, it is
"Babylon," "the land of the
Chaldeans," "the land of
Shinar," so that if the evidence
closed with the examination of
such passages, we should be shut
up to the conclusion that the
Babylonian exiles were taken
into an entirely different
region from
that to which the earlier exiles
had been taken. But it is
supposable that the earlier
exiles may
have spread into other countries
from those to which they were
first taken, and it is also
possible that the statement that
Nebuchadnezzar took exiles to
Babylon may mean that he took
them,
either directly or indirectly,
to any part of the Babylonian
empire. Whether it means this is
to
be determined by further
examination of the evidence. |